1987
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.07-12-03840.1987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential neuronal survival in the avian ciliary ganglion after chronic acetylcholine receptor blockade

Abstract: We have described in the preceding 2 papers the development of the pharmacological and contractile properties of all targets of the ciliary ganglion: the iris and ciliary body (Pilar et al., 1987), and the choroidal coat (Meriney and Pilar, 1987). In this paper, we examine the chronic effects of ACh receptor (AChR) blockade on ciliary ganglion neuron survival. Nicotinic or muscarinic AChR blockers were administered daily to developing chicken embryos during the normal neuronal death period in the ciliary gangl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results indicate that high-frequency signaling can produce sustained cell-wide calcium elevations, raising the possibility of excitotoxicity. Chronic exposure in ovo to nicotinic antagonists in general and ␣-Bgt in particular have pronounced and complex effects on neuronal survival and development in the ciliary ganglion (Meriney et al, 1987). It has not yet been possible, however, to dissect unambiguously the contributions of ganglionic receptors and peripheral muscle receptors to these events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results indicate that high-frequency signaling can produce sustained cell-wide calcium elevations, raising the possibility of excitotoxicity. Chronic exposure in ovo to nicotinic antagonists in general and ␣-Bgt in particular have pronounced and complex effects on neuronal survival and development in the ciliary ganglion (Meriney et al, 1987). It has not yet been possible, however, to dissect unambiguously the contributions of ganglionic receptors and peripheral muscle receptors to these events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depolarization is an important trophic stimulus accounting, at least in part, for neurotrophic support by presynaptic cells; blockade of membrane electrical activity in vivo (Wright, 1981;Furber et al, 1987;Meriney et al, 1987;Maderdrut et al, 1988;Rubel et al, 1990;Catsicas et al, 1992;Galli-Resta et al, 1993) and in vitro (Lipton, 1986;Ruitjer et al, 1991) reduces neuronal survival. Depolarization permits neuronal survival in vitro in the absence of added neurotrophic factors (Scott and Fisher, 1970;Bennett and White, 1979;Chalazonitis and Fischbach, 1980;Wakade et al, 1983;Gallo et al, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockade of afferent input increases death in vivo in central (Catsicas et al, 1992;Galli-Resta et al, 1993) and peripheral neurons (Wright, 1981;Furber et al, 1987;Meriney et al, 1987;Maderdrut et al, 1988). In the avian auditory system, removal of the cochlea causes rapid atrophic changes, culminating in a 25-30% loss of neurons in the target, nucleus magnocellularis (Born and Rubel, 1985;Steward and Rubel, 1985;Sie and Rubel, 1992); blockade of electrical activity results in rapid atrophic changes and loss of magnocellularis neurons comparable with those after complete cochlear ablation (Born and Rubel, 1988;Pasic and Rubel, 1989;Rubel et al, 1990;Sie and Rubel, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%