2020
DOI: 10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Neurobehavioral Effects of Cross-Modal Selective Priming on Phonetic and Emotional Prosodic Information in Late Second Language Learners

Abstract: Purpose Spoken language is inherently multimodal and multidimensional in natural settings, but very little is known about how second language (L2) learners undertake multilayered speech signals with both phonetic and affective cues. This study investigated how late L2 learners undertake parallel processing of linguistic and affective information in the speech signal at behavioral and neurophysiological levels. Method Behavioral and event-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data extend this pattern from picture and word priming to the effect of experimentally induced moods across blocks of stimuli. Although we have not found language effects in the LPP, a recent EEG study (Kao and Zhang, 2020) points out differences in emotional speech processing between L1 and L2 exactly in the late ERP components-N400 and LPP in the auditory modality. This shows that that language effects for emotional meaning are also modality-related, and future studies need to account not only for mood but also for modality effects when examining how bilinguals process emotional language in their respective linguistic systems.…”
Section: Lppcontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…The present data extend this pattern from picture and word priming to the effect of experimentally induced moods across blocks of stimuli. Although we have not found language effects in the LPP, a recent EEG study (Kao and Zhang, 2020) points out differences in emotional speech processing between L1 and L2 exactly in the late ERP components-N400 and LPP in the auditory modality. This shows that that language effects for emotional meaning are also modality-related, and future studies need to account not only for mood but also for modality effects when examining how bilinguals process emotional language in their respective linguistic systems.…”
Section: Lppcontrasting
confidence: 86%