2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2020.102346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential modulation of SK channel subtypes by phosphorylation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we identified K Ca 2.3 channels as the predominant subtype expressed in a mouse ET cell line, whereas the expression of K Ca 2.1, K Ca 2.2, and K Ca 3.1 channel subtypes was not detected by immunoblots. 36 Thus, we examined whether negative modulation by AP14145 of K Ca 2.3 channels affected the cilia length of the ET cells. AP14145 inhibited K Ca 2.3 channels with an IC 50 value of 0.97 ± 0.39 μM ( n = 5, Figure S5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, we identified K Ca 2.3 channels as the predominant subtype expressed in a mouse ET cell line, whereas the expression of K Ca 2.1, K Ca 2.2, and K Ca 3.1 channel subtypes was not detected by immunoblots. 36 Thus, we examined whether negative modulation by AP14145 of K Ca 2.3 channels affected the cilia length of the ET cells. AP14145 inhibited K Ca 2.3 channels with an IC 50 value of 0.97 ± 0.39 μM ( n = 5, Figure S5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ET cells do not express K Ca 2.1, K Ca 2.2, and K Ca 3.1 channels. 36 Therefore, the effect of apamin on the ET cells is mediated by the K Ca 2.3 channel blockade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To clarify the similarities and differences between hiPSC-ECs and native ECs, to determine the usefulness and importance of hiPSC-ECs in endothelial researches, we employed qPCR to study ion channels in our hiPSC-ECs and compared them with HCMECs. The expression of SK1 channels in isolated and cultured ECs were rarely detected, while the mRNA of SK2 channels were easily detectable [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Our study demonstrated that the expression of KCNN4 (SK4) gene, KCNMA1 (BK) gene, TRPV2 gene, SLC8A1 gene and KCNN2 (SK2) gene in hiPSC-ECs exhibited a much higher expression than HCMECs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, no significant difference in RP between hiPSC-ECs and HCMECs was observed. Currently, only several channel currents in ECs have been investigated, mainly focusing on I SK1–3 , I SK4 , I BK , I K1, and, I KATP [ 27 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], which were not studied in hiPSC-ECs. Thus, in our study, we mainly compared the current density of I SK1–3 , I SK4 , I BK , I K1, and I KATP in hiPSC-ECs with that of HCMECs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%