The ability of the ventral hippocampus (VH) for long-lasting long-term potentiation (LTP) and the mechanisms underlying its lower ability for short-lasting LTP compared with the dorsal hippocampus (DH) are unknown. Using recordings of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) from the CA1 field of adult rat hippocampal slices, we found that 200-Hz stimulation induced nondecremental LTP that was maintained for at least 7 h and was greater in the DH than in the VH. The interaction of NMDA receptors with L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels appeared to be more effective in the DH than in the VH. Furthermore, the LTP was significantly enhanced in the DH only, between 2 and 5 h post-tetanus. Furthermore, the mGluR5 contributed to the post-tetanic potentiation more in the VH than in the DH.The hippocampus is a brain structure with paramount capacity for phenomena of short-term and long-term synaptic plasticity (Bliss et al. 2007). Remarkably, this ability is not uniformly distributed along the long axis of the structure. Namely, the ability for longterm potentiation (LTP) induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS) is strikingly lower in the ventral hippocampus (VH) compared with the dorsal hippocampus (DH) (Papatheodoropoulos and Kostopoulos 2000;Maruki et al. 2001;Colgin et al. 2004;Maggio and Segal 2009;Kenney and Manahan-Vaughan 2013;Keralapurath et al. 2014). This is one of the most notable differences recently found in the intrinsic circuitry between the DH and the VH. Long-term synaptic plasticity is thought to be a fundamental mechanism that supports learning and memory (Matynia et al. 2002;Takeuchi et al. 2014). Thus, differences in the ability for LTP induction might contribute to the well-known functional segregation along the long (dorsoventral or septotemporal) axis of the hippocampus (Moser and Moser 1998;Fanselow and Dong 2010;Bast 2011;Goosens 2011;Small et al. 2011;Bannerman et al. 2014;Strange et al. 2014). Despite the established difference in the magnitude of HFS-induced LTP between the two hippocampus segments, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. This is because, although HFS-induced LTP can be blocked by antagonists of NMDARs (Park et al. 2014), HFS might induce compound LTP in the CA1 field with the participation of L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels (L-VDCCs), (Grover and Teyler 1990;Cavus and Teyler 1996;Morgan and Teyler 2001;Bayazitov et al. 2007) and of metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 (mGluR5) (Jia et al. 1998). NMDAR-dependent and L-VDCC-dependent LTP might have distinct implication in certain types of learning and memory (Morris et al. 1986;Tsien et al. 1996;Borroni et al. 2000;Moosmang et al. 2005). In addition, NMDAR-LTP and L-VDCC-LTP might preferentially be involved in retention of information over short and long periods of time, respectively (Borroni et al. 2000).A parameter of LTP particularly relevant for the implications of LTP in the memory function is the persistence of potentiation (Martin et al. 2000;Lynch 2004). Nondecremental LTP lasting for severa...