2015
DOI: 10.1002/sca.21186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential magnetic force microscope imaging

Abstract: This paper presents a method for differential magnetic force microscope imaging based on a two-pass scanning procedure to extract differential magnetic forces and eliminate or significantly reduce background forces with reversed tip magnetization. In the work, the difference of two scanned images with reversed tip magnetization was used to express the local magnetic forces. The magnetic sample was first scanned with a low lift distance between the MFM tip and the sample surface, and the magnetization direction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where V dc is the tip-sample static bias and C ts is the tip-sample capacitance [37]. Therefore, modulation of the tipsample bias and of the tip-sample capacitance result in electrostatic artifacts in MFM images [38][39][40][41][42][43]. In our method, electrostatic artifacts are removed by acquiring two subsequent images of the same area, the first in standard MFM and the second in MFM after demagnetization of the tip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where V dc is the tip-sample static bias and C ts is the tip-sample capacitance [37]. Therefore, modulation of the tipsample bias and of the tip-sample capacitance result in electrostatic artifacts in MFM images [38][39][40][41][42][43]. In our method, electrostatic artifacts are removed by acquiring two subsequent images of the same area, the first in standard MFM and the second in MFM after demagnetization of the tip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations along with earlier reports suggest that the origin of positive phase shifts in MFM images could be a combination of magnetic as well as non-magnetic interactions with the MFM probe. Further studies using approaches such as application of electric potentials to the MFM probe 47 or differential MFM imaging 50 may help resolve these contributions. It should also be noted that additional parameters like inter-particle dipole–dipole interactions 51 and heterogeneity in the chemical composition and size of the ferritin (iron) cores 52 could also be likely modulators of both negative and positive phase shifts in MFM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same CM-MFM instrumentation can be also used to distinguish the electrostatic and magnetic signals in MFM images of relatively hard ferromagnetic samples, the stray field of which could orient the domains of the tip, thus reducing the effectiveness of the tip demagnetization procedure. Indeed, a magnetic field with intensity − H rs , tip can be applied and switched off after the first scan, following a procedure analogous to that used in SM-MFM 25 26 or in differential MFM 27 . A second MFM image is recorded with the probe magnetized along the opposite direction with respect to the first one ( Fig.…”
Section: Step Ii: Determination Of the Magnetic Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential MFM is an analogous method recently proposed by Wang et al . 27 , in which the two MFM images with reversed polarization are acquired subsequently to the topography with the tip maintained at a fixed distance (lift height) from the surface (lift mode). The applicability of these techniques for the evaluation of the electrostatic and magnetic signal is limited to hard ferromagnetic materials, having significant remanent magnetic moment and coercivity sufficiently high to ensure a constant magnetization of the sample even after the application of the external magnetic field necessary to invert the probe magnetization and under the magnetic stray field induced by the tip during the scan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%