2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.646346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential luminescence thermometry in semiconductor laser cooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature of the sample is measured in a non-contact way, utilizing differential luminescence thermometry (DLT) technique . 9 Cooling results are displayed in Figure 2. Initially, pump laser is tuned to 1027nm, but after steady-state is reached, pump laser is blue-shifted in sequence allowing sample to reach thermal equilibrium at each point.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature of the sample is measured in a non-contact way, utilizing differential luminescence thermometry (DLT) technique . 9 Cooling results are displayed in Figure 2. Initially, pump laser is tuned to 1027nm, but after steady-state is reached, pump laser is blue-shifted in sequence allowing sample to reach thermal equilibrium at each point.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Recently an EQE of 99% at 100K has been reported by our group. 2,8 While this satisfies the criteria for laser cooling, the presence of parasitic background absorption has remained as the key challenge in achieving this goal .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most laser cooling demonstrations require the measurement of temperature using fine thermo-couples 17 , thermal cameras 1 , refractive index monitoring 5,18 , the measurement of the emitted fluorescence spectra of the sample 19 , or of a fluorescent probe 20,21 . Difficulties in temperature measurement due to the transparency of the material at the detected wavelength 17 , competing optical effects 18 , complex optical alignment, or pump modulation 20 can make the calibration cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%