1986
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90180-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential localization of inferior olivary neurons projecting to the tecto-olivo-recipient zones of lobule VII or crus II in the rat cerebellum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A face representation was also found medially within the paramedian lobule (area 1) in agreement with previous physiological studies of climbing-fibre-mediated trigeminal inputs to the rat cerebellum (e.g. Armstrong and Drew, 1980;Akaike, 1986). Although the early classic studies of somatotopical organisation in cat predated the characterisation of cerebellar responses as either mossy fibre or climbing fibre in origin, it is noteworthy that a face receiving area located in the medial part of rostral paramedian lobule was described in the monkey (Snider and Eldred, 1952).…”
Section: Somatotopy Within the Cerebellar Cortexsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A face representation was also found medially within the paramedian lobule (area 1) in agreement with previous physiological studies of climbing-fibre-mediated trigeminal inputs to the rat cerebellum (e.g. Armstrong and Drew, 1980;Akaike, 1986). Although the early classic studies of somatotopical organisation in cat predated the characterisation of cerebellar responses as either mossy fibre or climbing fibre in origin, it is noteworthy that a face receiving area located in the medial part of rostral paramedian lobule was described in the monkey (Snider and Eldred, 1952).…”
Section: Somatotopy Within the Cerebellar Cortexsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although a number of singleunit studies of climbing fibre responses have been carried out (e.g., Logan and Robertson, 1986;Mulle et al, 1987), few investigations have charted the distribution of climbing fibre field potentials generated as a result of peripheral stimulation of different body parts. Such studies have been confined largely to investigations of trigemino-and tectoolivocerebellar pathways (e.g., Armstrong and Drew, 1980;Akaike, 1986), and only very limited data are available regarding the localisation of climbing fibre field potentials evoked by limb stimulation. Thus, the aim of the present investigation was to use both electrophysiological field potential recording techniques and anatomical retrograde tracer methods to test for the presence of a somatotopical organisation within the climbing fibre input to the rat cerebellum and to examine how this organisation may relate to a zonal organisation within the olivocerebellar projection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the question of exactly which cortical areas to record from has yet to be resolved. As indicated in Fig 9, Akaike [62], [63], [72], [100] described two apparently separated TOR regions arranged rostro-caudally in the paravermis from lobule VIa to VII. Brief references are also made by Akaike [63] to a third region in the paramedian lobule (Fig 9).…”
Section: Dicussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The medial TOR area appears similar in location to the oculomotor vermis of cats and primates. In contrast, the lateral TOR areas in zone A2 (the paravermal part of lobules VI and VII) do not have an equivalent in cat or primate, and the olivary cells that project to them are distinct from those that project to the mTOR area [62], [63], [72], [73]. The laterally projecting olivary cells appear to convey vibrissal information, relayed at least in part from the superior colliculus [74], [75].The precise nature of the information is unknown, but recordings from neurons throughout the inferior olive in awake cats have suggested that many "function as somatic event detectors responding particularly reliably to unexpected stimuli" ([76], p.40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the responses evoked by M2 stimulation may be explained by its direct projections to the superior colliculus. The superior colliculus, in turn, has been shown in a range of species to project to the caudal medial accessory olive (cMAO) (monkey: Frankfurter et al, 1976, 1977; Harting, 1977, cat: Jeneskog, 1983; Kyuhou and Matsuzaki, 1991; Weber et al, 1978, rabbit: Holstege and Collewijn, 1982, rat: Akaike, 1985; Hess, 1982; Swenson and Castro, 1983), and cMAO (subnucleus c) in turn provides the main climbing fibre input to vermal lobule VII (Apps, 1990; Gwyn et al, 1977; Sugita et al, 1989, see also Akaike, 1985, 1986, 1992; Hess, 1982). On the other hand, the periaqueductal grey is a potential candidate as a site of relay between PrL and cerebellar vermal lobule VII because it also has connections with cMAO (Swenson and Castro, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%