2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.04598
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential item functioning via robust scaling

Abstract: This paper proposes a new method for assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in item response theory (IRT) models. The method does not require pre-specification of anchor items, which is its main virtue. It is developed in two main steps, first by showing how DIF can be re-formulated as a problem of outlier detection in IRT-based scaling, then tackling the latter using established methods from robust statistics. The proposal is a redescending M-estimator of IRT scaling parameters that is tuned to flag it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of country-to-country item-level variation has been documented even with highly engineered educational surveys such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (e.g., Zwitser, Glaser, & Maris, 2017), and initial research points to similar concerns with assessments of ECD (e.g., Halpin et al, 2019;Waldman et al, 2021). Psychometric methodology for international comparisons remains an active area of research (e.g., von Davier & Bezirhan, 2022;Halpin, 2022) and can directly inform ongoing efforts in ECD assessment.…”
Section: Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This type of country-to-country item-level variation has been documented even with highly engineered educational surveys such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (e.g., Zwitser, Glaser, & Maris, 2017), and initial research points to similar concerns with assessments of ECD (e.g., Halpin et al, 2019;Waldman et al, 2021). Psychometric methodology for international comparisons remains an active area of research (e.g., von Davier & Bezirhan, 2022;Halpin, 2022) and can directly inform ongoing efforts in ECD assessment.…”
Section: Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…M-estimation theory was applied in the investigation of DIF and linking in [28][29][30]. The simultaneous treatment of standard errors and linking errors in IRT models relying on M-estimation was presented in [18,31] (see also [32]).…”
Section: Linking Error and M-estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using a robust function that fulfills the property ρ(x)/|x| → ∞ for |x| → ∞ (see [29,30]). For example, if the median was used, ρ would be the sign function…”
Section: Robust Log-mean-mean Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%