“…This interpretation is bolstered by observations that traits exhibiting steep clines across hybrid zones are often involved in local adaptation (e.g., Culumber, Shepard, Coleman, Rosenthal, & Tobler, ; Culumber et al., ; Mullen & Hoekstra, ; Taylor et al., ; Walsh, Rowe, Olsen, Shriver, & Kovach, ) and that individuals with intermediate phenotypes are frequently maladapted to their environments (e.g., Delmore & Irwin, ; Hanson, Moore, Taylor, Barrett, & Hendry, ; Huber, De Leon, Hendry, Bermingham, & Podos, ), are unattractive as mates (e.g., Naisbit, Jiggins, & Mallet, ; Rundle, Nagel, Boughman, & Schluter, ; Saether et al., ) or both (e.g., Jiggins, Estrada, & Rodrigues, ). Furthermore, a particular trait is more likely to contribute to reproductive isolation if its cline is steeper than the average ancestry cline, as this suggests that the loci associated with that trait introgress across the hybrid zone at lower rates than the genome‐wide average (Baldassarre, White, Karubian, & Webster, ; Gay et al., ; Walsh, Shriver, Olsen, & Kovach, ; Wu, ). Comparing the location and width of phenotypic and genotypic clines is thus informative about the roles of different traits in contributing to isolating barriers.…”