1986
DOI: 10.1364/ao.25.002391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential interferometric technique for the measurement of the nonlinear index of refraction of ruby and GdAlO_3:Cr^+3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can write the refractive index as n n o Δn, where the refractive index of the unpumped crystal n o (when N ex 0) is given by n 2 o 1 4πf L χ m N t · α pg and f L n 2 o 2∕3 is the Lorenz local field correction factor. The refractive index change Δn is proportional to the susceptibility change due to the excited state population, Δχ Δα p :N ex , and is given by [10] Δn…”
Section: Theoretical Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can write the refractive index as n n o Δn, where the refractive index of the unpumped crystal n o (when N ex 0) is given by n 2 o 1 4πf L χ m N t · α pg and f L n 2 o 2∕3 is the Lorenz local field correction factor. The refractive index change Δn is proportional to the susceptibility change due to the excited state population, Δχ Δα p :N ex , and is given by [10] Δn…”
Section: Theoretical Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their theoretical analysis, the authors concluded that the refractive index grating, also called the dispersive grating, instead of the absorption grating, gives the dominant contribution to the process. The first quantitative measurement of the nonlinearity in ruby was made using an interferometric technique [10] that conclusively demonstrated the dispersive origin of the phase conjugation, since it was measured that the real part of the refractive index change was 1 order of magnitude larger than the imaginary one. From this result, it was found that the polarizability difference between excited and ground states of ruby is Δα p 1.6 × 10 −25 cm 3 , a value which was later confirmed by several experiments [4,7,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is a time dependent signal proportional to the laser power contained in the peripheral area of the Gaussian laser beam (with width Win the mask plane). (11) fr =AP =A1T(O.O4P), (12) where P is the instantaneous power of the incident laser signal. The next step is to express the ratio V2 I V as a function of the beam divergence e .…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest method to measure the nonlinear optical properties of materials is Z-scan method. Z-scan is a wellestablished method for the determination of nonlinear refraction and absorption and has been widely used in material characterization since it can provide not only the magnitudes of real and imaginary parts of nonlinear susceptibility, but also their signs (Yang et al 2004;Catunda et al 1986;Tingchao et al 2008;He et al 1997). In this method, the sample is scanned along the propagation path of a focus the Gaussian laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%