2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential induction of interferon stimulated genes between type I and type III interferons is independent of interferon receptor abundance

Abstract: It is currently believed that type I and III interferons (IFNs) have redundant functions. However, the preferential distribution of type III IFN receptor on epithelial cells suggests functional differences at epithelial surfaces. Here, using human intestinal epithelial cells we could show that although both type I and type III IFNs confer an antiviral state to the cells, they do so with distinct kinetics. Type I IFN signaling is characterized by an acute strong induction of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
119
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
7
119
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in human colon organoids we observed that only type III IFN is made upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, although human intestinal organoids are capable of making both type I and III IFN upon enteric virus infection (Pervolaraki et al, 2018;Stanifer et al, 2020). The lack of type I induction appears to be specific to SARS-CoV-2 and it is likely that this virus encodes a specific antagonist which counteracts the production of type I IFN only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, in human colon organoids we observed that only type III IFN is made upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, although human intestinal organoids are capable of making both type I and III IFN upon enteric virus infection (Pervolaraki et al, 2018;Stanifer et al, 2020). The lack of type I induction appears to be specific to SARS-CoV-2 and it is likely that this virus encodes a specific antagonist which counteracts the production of type I IFN only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The reason for the difference in the amount of IFN made upon infection of lung vs. intestinal epithelial cells is currently unclear. Like intestinal epithelial cells(Pervolaraki et al, 2017(Pervolaraki et al, , 2018Pott et al, 2011), lung epithelial cells are normally highly immunoresponsive and make IFNs upon viral infection(Crotta et al, 2013;Ye et al, 2019). The lack of IFN in lung epithelial cells following SARS-CoV-2 infection might be specific for this virus in this tissue(Blanco-Melo et al, 2020) as SARS-CoV-1 induces IFN production in infected lung tissue(Chu et al).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also revealed that HEV UTR PAMPs induce type I and type III IFN responses in a cell type-dependent fashion. Studies have shown that various IFN subtypes exert different spatial and temporal activation kinetic patterns in vivo (33) and also use distinct mechanisms to establish antiviral states in vitro (34). Therefore, the complexity of virus-host interactions modulates the expression of various IFN subtypes and, in turn, controls the antiviral response kinetics at a given target organ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with a paper recently published showing that ISGs can be grouped into four groups, those that are induced within 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours or take 24 hours. IFITM3 was within the 24 hour group, at which point the experiment was stopped (25). This delay in IFITM3 expression following IFN induction further increases the risk of infection in cells with low IFITM3 basal expression, even if they can then induce IFITM3 following IFN stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%