1991
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential induction of interferon gamma gene expression after activation of CD4+ T cells by conventional antigen and Mls superantigen.

Abstract: We have analyzed cytokine gene expression by a murine CD4+ T-cell clone that expresses three forms of T-cell recognition. The clone employs a Vp6-containing T-cell receptor to recognize (i) a self class II major histocompatibility complex and an ovalbumin-derived peptide (OVA), (u) an I-Ab alloantigen, and (iii) Mls-1a. All three responses are accompanied by similar levels of cell proliferation. However, although interferon y gene expression is strongly induced during both physiological recognition of the OVA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies should clarify these issues. Nevertheless, the observations that a conventional antigen and a superantigen induce different cytokine gene expressions in the same T-cell clone (24) and that antigen and superantigen induce additive responses (20) support the theory that intracellular biochemical events initiated by TCR ligation by these two classes of ligands are functionally distinct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Further studies should clarify these issues. Nevertheless, the observations that a conventional antigen and a superantigen induce different cytokine gene expressions in the same T-cell clone (24) and that antigen and superantigen induce additive responses (20) support the theory that intracellular biochemical events initiated by TCR ligation by these two classes of ligands are functionally distinct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Surprisingly, the VB8-specific antibody F23.1 was not capable of killing GAIN-or RU-38486-sensitized BALB/c mice (Table 1), indicating that the mode of stimulation exerted by this antibody must differ from that of the equally V~8-specific superantigen SEB. Accordingly, the signal transduction cascades triggered by superantigens and conventional stimuli exhibit an only partial overlap in vitro (26,27). Moreover, F23.1 differs from SEB in the sense that its in vitro application fails to trigger an expansion of V/% + T cells but rather provokes an immediate programmed cell death-mediated depletion of V/38 + T cells (data not shown).…”
Section: Endogenous Gc Protect Mice Against the Lethal Effect Of Acutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have suggested that superantigens interact with MHC class II molecules outside the antigen-binding groove (8) and may bind to the T-cell receptor (TCR) away from the predicted combining site for conventional ligands (9). These findings have raised the possibility that the interaction of the TCR with conventional peptide antigen and with superantigen may have distinct functional consequences (10). We have addressed this question using murine T helper (TH) clones that bear receptors that allow clonal proliferation in response to both classes of ligand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%