Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1991
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(91)90205-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential induction of glutathione transferase isoenzymes of mice stomach by diallyl sulfide, a naturally occurring anticarcinogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reciprocal behavior suggests that after a certain threshold value for GST activity saturation with fluorodifen, other GST isoenzymes are activated linearly in the cytosol to protect cells from damage due to accumulation of reactive substances under stress conditions. The observed strong stimulation of microsomal and cytosolic GST activities with CDNB and fluorodifen in EH5 by STS is consistent with the activation of microsomal and cytosolic GST activities in biofilms (Table 3) by various stress factors (see above), sulfhydryl reagents (37), sulforaphane (12,29), and diallyl sulfide (34). However, the low toxicity of STS, the high sensitivity of induction of GST by STS (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reciprocal behavior suggests that after a certain threshold value for GST activity saturation with fluorodifen, other GST isoenzymes are activated linearly in the cytosol to protect cells from damage due to accumulation of reactive substances under stress conditions. The observed strong stimulation of microsomal and cytosolic GST activities with CDNB and fluorodifen in EH5 by STS is consistent with the activation of microsomal and cytosolic GST activities in biofilms (Table 3) by various stress factors (see above), sulfhydryl reagents (37), sulforaphane (12,29), and diallyl sulfide (34). However, the low toxicity of STS, the high sensitivity of induction of GST by STS (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Most of our knowledge of the function of GSTs has come from studies of animals and plants, and there have been relatively few studies of microbes (34,40,50). The resultant glutathione conjugates are less toxic and more polar than the parent compounds and can be stored in vacuoles or excreted from the biological system, helping the organism regain normal cellular functions and reducing the cellular toxicity of reactive parent or organic intermediates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] In the study by Boeing et shown to inhibit mutagenesis, initiation, and promotion al., 27 onion consumption was no longer significantly assobut also to induce enzymes important in the detoxificaciated with a lower stomach cancer risk after additional tion of carcinogens. 8, 51,52 However, because the evidence adjustment for vegetables and fruit.…”
Section: / M4433f0014mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction of phase II detoxification enzymes by DAS (2,19,20), could limit the mutagenicity of a wide range of carcinogens by stimulating conjugation and excretion of reactive intermediates. In the present study, formation of urinary metabolites from NMBzA was not significantly altered by an acute dose of DAS administered either 3 or 18 h earlier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%