2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential impact of the first and second wave of a stress response on subsequent fear conditioning in healthy men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trial order was pseudorandom, with the restriction of no more than 2 consecutive CS+ or CS− trials. Intertrial intervals ranged from 12 to 26 s (M = 21 s), closely related to our previous study (Antov et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fear Acquisition and Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Trial order was pseudorandom, with the restriction of no more than 2 consecutive CS+ or CS− trials. Intertrial intervals ranged from 12 to 26 s (M = 21 s), closely related to our previous study (Antov et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fear Acquisition and Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We have recently shown that inducing the first-wave stress response (without GC-increases), by using the cold pressor test (CPT) prior to fear acquisition, renders fear memory more resistant to immediate extinction in humans (Antov et al, 2013). This raised the question if the CPT had enhanced fear learning manifesting in elevated extinction resistance -in accordance with the model (Schwabe et al, 2012) -or if the CPT impaired extinction learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations