The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/649312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Impact of Lactose/Lactase Phenotype on Colonic Microflora

Abstract: Despite failure to achieve full colonic adaptation, the present study provided evidence for a differential impact of lactose on microflora depending on genetic lactase status. A prebiotic effect was evident in lactose maldigesters but not in lactose digesters. This may play a role in modifying the mechanisms of certain disease risks related to dairy food consumption between the two phenotypes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disjoint between a positive breath test for malabsorption and symptom presentation appears to parallel the situation with lactose intolerance; only one‐third to one‐half of individuals who malabsorb lactose will develop symptoms of intolerance, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, or bloating . Major factors that may contribute to whether an individual who malabsorbs carbohydrate is symptomatic include the following: the amount of the problem carbohydrate consumed in the diet and the form in which it is consumed (as sugar loads in breath testing are often far higher than physiological doses and deliver the carbohydrate in pure form rather than as a component of a food); the composition of the subject's intestinal flora and the adaptation of the colonic flora to malabsorption; and, possibly, a psychosomatic component . Despite these issues, due to the unreliability of patient reporting of a correlation between symptoms and lactose ingestion, the lactose BHT has continued to be recommended and widely used in children and adults .…”
Section: Breath Hydrogen Testing Principles and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disjoint between a positive breath test for malabsorption and symptom presentation appears to parallel the situation with lactose intolerance; only one‐third to one‐half of individuals who malabsorb lactose will develop symptoms of intolerance, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, or bloating . Major factors that may contribute to whether an individual who malabsorbs carbohydrate is symptomatic include the following: the amount of the problem carbohydrate consumed in the diet and the form in which it is consumed (as sugar loads in breath testing are often far higher than physiological doses and deliver the carbohydrate in pure form rather than as a component of a food); the composition of the subject's intestinal flora and the adaptation of the colonic flora to malabsorption; and, possibly, a psychosomatic component . Despite these issues, due to the unreliability of patient reporting of a correlation between symptoms and lactose ingestion, the lactose BHT has continued to be recommended and widely used in children and adults .…”
Section: Breath Hydrogen Testing Principles and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,30 Major factors that may contribute to whether an individual who malabsorbs carbohydrate is symptomatic include the following: the amount of the problem carbohydrate consumed in the diet and the form in which it is consumed (as sugar loads in breath testing are often far higher than physiological doses and deliver the carbohydrate in pure form rather than as a component of a food); the composition of the subject's intestinal flora and the adaptation of the colonic flora to malabsorption; and, possibly, a psychosomatic component. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Despite these issues, due to the unreliability of patient reporting of a correlation between symptoms and lactose ingestion, 31,38 the lactose BHT has continued to be recommended and widely used in children and adults. 6,30 The same factors are likely to influence the relationship between fructose BHT interpretation, malabsorption, and intolerance, 13,16 but this will require further study.…”
Section: Breath Hydrogen Testing Principles and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to human studies, lactose supplementation is able to exert prebiotic effects such as increase of intestinal beneficial bacteria (bifidobacteria and lactobacilli) (Szilagyi et al 2010), higher production of SCFA (Szilagyi 2004) and inhibition of potential pathogenic bacteria such as clostridia (Szilagyi 2004) only in lactose intolerant people and not in lactose digesters (discerned by the breath-hydrogen analysis), even at relative high-dose supplementations (50 g/day for 2 weeks; Szilagyi et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human gut contains a significant number of different bacteria, which are potential contributors to the total fecal GAL-activity [34,35]. Measurement of GAL activity therefore represents an alternative indicator of fecal contamination than the traditional culturable coliforms, FC or E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%