1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19970615)35:4<473::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential healing and neovascularization of ePTFE implants in subcutaneous versus adipose tissue

Abstract: The preclinical evaluation of polymer biocompatibility is often performed using animal subcutaneous implant models. The choice of subcutaneous tissue as the implant site is due to a number of factors including simplicity of the surgery involved. Results from subcutaneous implants cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other tissues due to the differences in cellular composition of tissues. We have evaluated and compared the healing characteristics of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) discs implanted in e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previously described observations12, 13, 23, bare ePTFE implants, regardless of whether or not the polymer was modified, were surrounded by a matrix-rich, cellular layer of tissue (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar to previously described observations12, 13, 23, bare ePTFE implants, regardless of whether or not the polymer was modified, were surrounded by a matrix-rich, cellular layer of tissue (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Another explanation may be that vascular structures promote incorporation of the implant 46. This relationship between vascular structures and capsule formation is demonstrated in a recent in vivo study by Sanders et al,33 in which single polypropylene fibers, with different diameters ranging from 2.1 to 26.7 μm, were implanted in rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The foreign body response that leads to the formation of a relatively avascular capsule varies significantly by tissue type [5, 7]. For example, implants placed in lean tissues have very different healing responses than the same implants in fat [8, 10]. Specifically, implants in rat subcutaneous lean tissue lead to the formation of extensive fibrous capsules as well as reduced vascularity in the tissue adjacent to the implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%