2014
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential gene expression of chemokines inKRASandBRAFmutated colorectal cell lines: Role of cytokines

Abstract: To summarize, basal chemokine gene expression for pro-angiogenic chemokines was high in mutated as compared to wild type cell-lines. This reflects the likely existence of a different microenvironment in tumours consistent of wild type or mutated cells. This may help to rationalize the choice of molecular targets for suitable therapeutic investigation in clinical studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of ELISA assay verified the decrease of IL-8 and CXCL1 in CRC cells treated with sTLR4/MD-2 complex (Figure 4C). These results of pro-inflammatory and migration cytokines were consistent with previous studies [37, 38]. Since these pro-inflammatory and migration cytokines constituted tumor microenvironment of CRC to affect tumor progression [18], it was suggested in our study that sTLR4/MD-2 complex can inhibit tumor progress (Figure 5A) whereas sTLR4 or MD-2 alone could not inhibit tumor progress as effectively as sTLR4/MD-2 complex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of ELISA assay verified the decrease of IL-8 and CXCL1 in CRC cells treated with sTLR4/MD-2 complex (Figure 4C). These results of pro-inflammatory and migration cytokines were consistent with previous studies [37, 38]. Since these pro-inflammatory and migration cytokines constituted tumor microenvironment of CRC to affect tumor progression [18], it was suggested in our study that sTLR4/MD-2 complex can inhibit tumor progress (Figure 5A) whereas sTLR4 or MD-2 alone could not inhibit tumor progress as effectively as sTLR4/MD-2 complex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A strength of our in vitro data is that the role of BRAF and KRAS mutation in the regulation of cytokine/chemokine secretion was studied in the same genetic and epigenetic background in Caco2 cells (MSS, CIMP negative, BRAF and KRAS wild type ). When cytokine/chemokine secretion was compared in BRAF and KRAS mutated CRC cell lines with different genetic backgrounds, the results were contradictory . However, our in vitro findings could also reflect the results of later analysis of the expression of CXCL10, CCL22 and TGFB1 in tumour specimens from CRC patients carrying oncogenic mutations in either BRAF or KRAS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Our observations that decrease CXCL1 secretion by SW620 cells inhibited their anchorage-independent and xenograft tumor growth are supported by similar findings in KRAS mutant LS174T CRC cells, whose malignant growth were inhibited by CXCL1 siRNA or neutralizing α-CXCL1 antibody [ 24 , 25 ]. Treatment of KRAS mutant DLD-1 CRC cells with KRAS siRNA resulted in suppression of KRAS mutant expression and a corresponding decrease in CXCL1 level [ 26 ]. Interestingly, colorectal tumors that developed due to chronic ulcerative colitis had a lower frequency of KRAS mutation [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%