1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03683.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Facial Responses to Four Basic Tastes in Newborns

Abstract: The distinctiveness and recognizability of taste-elicited facial expressions in newborns were examined in 2 studies. Sucrose, sodium chloride, citric acid, and quinine hydrochloride solutions were presented to 12 infants at 2 hours of age. In Study 1, the anatomically based Facial Action Coding System adapted for infants (Baby FACS) was used to obtain detailed, objective descriptions of the infants' videotaped facial responses to each solution. Facial responses to sucrose were characterized primarily by facial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
153
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
153
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Because previous research 15,23,24 has shown that negative facial configurations are more discriminating than positive configurations in gauging the infants' hedonic responsiveness, the videotape analyses focused on frequency of negative facial responses (eg, nose wrinkling, brow lowering, upper lip raising, gaping, head turning) made in response to each spoonful of cereal proffered. During scoring, the sound was turned off so that the raters would not be influenced by the infants' vocalizations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Because previous research 15,23,24 has shown that negative facial configurations are more discriminating than positive configurations in gauging the infants' hedonic responsiveness, the videotape analyses focused on frequency of negative facial responses (eg, nose wrinkling, brow lowering, upper lip raising, gaping, head turning) made in response to each spoonful of cereal proffered. During scoring, the sound was turned off so that the raters would not be influenced by the infants' vocalizations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newborn baby shows innate preferences for sweet tastes and innate dislikes for sour or bitter tastes 1,2 . From an evolutionary perspective these innate acceptance patterns serve as important biological functions, since in nature sweetness is associated with readily available calories from carbohydrates, and bitterness is correlated with toxicity 3 .…”
Section: Development Of Eating Habitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, tickling, having the infant taste lemon juice in contrast to sweet and bitter solutions, sudden violations such as that produced by a jack-inthe-box, the entry of a masked stranger, arm restraint, or removal of a teething biscuit have all been used to elicit facial expressions in young infants (Bendersky, Sullivan, Alessandri, & Lewis, 1995;Braungart-Reiker & Stifter, 1996;Charlesworth, 1969;Fox & Davidson, 1986;Granchrow, Steiner, & Daher, 1983;Kochanska, Coy, Tjebkes, & Husarek, 1998;Rosenstein & Oster, 1988;Scarr & Salapatek, 1970;Skarkin, 1977;Sroufe & Wunsch, 1972;Steiner, 1979;Stenberg, Campos, & Emde, 1983). These situations represent only a sample of the various contexts that have been devised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%