2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-5046-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Expression of Genes within the Cochlea as Defined by a Custom Mouse Inner Ear Microarray

Abstract: Microarray analyses have contributed greatly to the rapid understanding of functional genomics through the identification of gene networks as well as gene discovery. To facilitate functional genomics of the inner ear, we have developed a mouse inner-earpertinent custom microarray chip (CMA-IE1). Nonredundant cDNA clones were obtained from two cDNA library resources: the RIKEN subtracted inner ear set and the NIH organ of Corti library. At least 2000 cDNAs unique to the inner ear were present on the chip. Compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three separate microarray experiments were performed: two experiments using two rounds of RNA amplification to compare expression differences between the cochleae from Slo ϩ/ϩ and Slo Ϫ/Ϫ mice and one experiment using a single round of RNA amplification to compare expression differences between the cochleae and cerebellum from Slo ϩ/ϩ mice and the cochleae from Slo Ϫ/Ϫ mice. Table 1 shows that in our experiments, transcripts known to be enriched in the cochlea (47)(48)(49)(50) are detected as 2-fold or more enriched in the cochlea in comparison with the cerebellum (both from Slo ϩ/ϩ mice). These data indicate that microarray analyses can indeed detect expression differences in the cochlea.…”
Section: Regulation Of Other Gene Products Does Not Compensate For Thmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Three separate microarray experiments were performed: two experiments using two rounds of RNA amplification to compare expression differences between the cochleae from Slo ϩ/ϩ and Slo Ϫ/Ϫ mice and one experiment using a single round of RNA amplification to compare expression differences between the cochleae and cerebellum from Slo ϩ/ϩ mice and the cochleae from Slo Ϫ/Ϫ mice. Table 1 shows that in our experiments, transcripts known to be enriched in the cochlea (47)(48)(49)(50) are detected as 2-fold or more enriched in the cochlea in comparison with the cerebellum (both from Slo ϩ/ϩ mice). These data indicate that microarray analyses can indeed detect expression differences in the cochlea.…”
Section: Regulation Of Other Gene Products Does Not Compensate For Thmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This is the first study demonstrating the expression of NaBC1 protein in the mammalian cochlea. In an earlier study using a mouse inner ear microarray, Slc4a11 message was detected in the lateral wall of the cochlea (24). This finding was interpreted as having localized the cotransporter to the stria vascularis (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Removal of the tectorial and Reissner's membranes and the stria vascularis improved probe access to the hair cells. Total RNA was obtained from freshly dissected cochleae and cochlear fractions using RNAlater and RNAqueous (Ambion, Austin, TX) (Morris et al, 2005). The organ of Corti was further dissected by separating the IHCand OHC-containing fragments at the tunnel of Corti.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%