2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential expression of aquaporin-4 isoforms localizes with neuromyelitis optica disease activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observation also supports the recent finding of two different missense allelic mutations at Arg19 (R19I and R19T), which enhance susceptibility to NMO and are located within the first 22 residues of the N-terminus of the protein, unique to the AQP4-M 1 [28]. The M 1 isoform of AQP4 seems to be important for NMO, since it is preferentially expressed in the optic nerve and spinal cord, where NMO lesions are usually found [29]. However, in another study, the M 23 isoform has been proposed as a major target of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our observation also supports the recent finding of two different missense allelic mutations at Arg19 (R19I and R19T), which enhance susceptibility to NMO and are located within the first 22 residues of the N-terminus of the protein, unique to the AQP4-M 1 [28]. The M 1 isoform of AQP4 seems to be important for NMO, since it is preferentially expressed in the optic nerve and spinal cord, where NMO lesions are usually found [29]. However, in another study, the M 23 isoform has been proposed as a major target of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Optic nerve susceptibility in NMO might also arise from the high AQP4 expression in optic nerve compared to brain (Saini et al, 2010) and the abundance of large OAPs in perivascular astrocytic end-feet of optic nerve (Bäuerle and Wolburg, 1993; Amiry-Moghaddam et al, 2004; Nicchia et al, 2008), which enhance AQP4-IgG binding and CDC, as mentioned above. The presence of plasma blasts in the CSF secreting AQP4-IgG locally (Bennett et al, 2009) and/or regional variations in regulators of complement (CD46 and CD59) may also be involved in the unique susceptibility of the optic nerve in NMO.…”
Section: Pathogenesis Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the CNS is damaged by NMO disease, but NMO-IgG has access to peripheral AQP4-bearing tissues (Lennon, Kryzer et al 2005; Pohl, Fischer et al 2011). It has been proposed that a specific conformation or isoform may be enriched in the optic nerve and spinal cord to account for the distribution of lesions in NMO, while other brain regions or peripheral organs are spared (Saini, Fernandez et al 2010). However, adsorption of NMO-IgG to AQP4-expressing cells before infusion can dampen its pathogenic potency (Bradl, Misu et al 2009), arguing against this mechanism.…”
Section: Pathological Potential Of Nmo-igg By Passive Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMO is unique among inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) in that 33–91% of patients worldwide test positive for the NMO-IgG biomarker (Jarius and Wildemann 2010), an antibody that targets the aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel on the endfeet of astrocytes (Lennon, Kryzer et al 2005). The discovery of the NMO-IgG in 2004 (Lennon, Wingerchuk et al 2004) created a surge of research publications on the prospect that the NMO-IgG may be pathogenic in inducing or exacerbating the disease by binding to AQP4 in susceptible CNS tissues (Roemer, Parisi et al 2007; Saini, Fernandez et al 2010). Building on decades of research on rodent models of multiple sclerosis, several groups have turned to rats and mice to understand the pathogenesis of NMO with specific questions about the roles of the NMO-IgG and AQP4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%