2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential evolution algorithm applied to wireless sensor distribution on different geometric shapes with area and energy optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…et al in [25], suggested that the DE algorithm was presented for the situation in which the communication range value was unknown to deal with the optimization problem. Cespedes-Mota et al in [26] utilised the multiobjective DE algorithm to improve the sensor distribution over the multiple areas within the geolocation and to expand the coverage area and to minimize the network energy consumption at the same time. The PSO algorithm is a nature inspired algorithm by the social behavior of birds, has been one of the most popular optimization algorithms that is widely applied to solve complex optimization problems in WSNs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al in [25], suggested that the DE algorithm was presented for the situation in which the communication range value was unknown to deal with the optimization problem. Cespedes-Mota et al in [26] utilised the multiobjective DE algorithm to improve the sensor distribution over the multiple areas within the geolocation and to expand the coverage area and to minimize the network energy consumption at the same time. The PSO algorithm is a nature inspired algorithm by the social behavior of birds, has been one of the most popular optimization algorithms that is widely applied to solve complex optimization problems in WSNs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aimed at guaranteeing the task completion instantaneously and extending the life-cycle of network, the authors in [30] presented an energy-efficiency node scheduling algorithm based on game theory for WSNs, and the payoff function includes both the residual energy and local task load of the sensor nodes. A Hungarian algorithm (HA) [31] is used to solve the NP-hard problem of deterministic coverage enhancement with small time complexity [32], that is, the shortest moving scheme between the initial position of each sensor node and the position to be deployed is determined by the maximum matching algorithm of bipartite graph [33,34]. The above algorithms based on task assignment all ignore the optimization of reducing the maximum energy cost of sensors and balancing the residual energy, which are exactly the keys that affect the life-cycle of WSNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NSGAII has a disadvantage that the distribution of non-dominated solutions is uneven, especially on high-dimensional optimization problems. In [14], the multi-objective differential evolution algorithm (MODEA) is applied to the WSN deployment of the geometric polygon monitoring area, the coverage rate and energy consumption rate of WSN are taken as optimization objectives. A good solution is provided in [14], but the paper does not consider the energy consumption due to data transmission and reception.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], the multi-objective differential evolution algorithm (MODEA) is applied to the WSN deployment of the geometric polygon monitoring area, the coverage rate and energy consumption rate of WSN are taken as optimization objectives. A good solution is provided in [14], but the paper does not consider the energy consumption due to data transmission and reception. The works of [15]- [16] optimize the network coverage, energy consumption rate and energy balance rate, using different approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%