1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00009-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects on D2 dopamine receptor and prolactin gene expression by haloperidol and aripiprazole in the rat pituitary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent preferential action of these compounds at peripheral over central D 2 receptors is consistent with results from ex vivo occupancy studies (Kapur et al, 2002). The aripiprazole-induced prolactin release measured in the present study is at variance with published data showing a smaller increase or even a decrease in prolactin levels in rats (Inoue et al, 1996(Inoue et al, , 1998. Although a D 2 agonistic component of aripiprazole would be expected to reduce the prolactin release originating from its D 2 receptor blockade (Marchese et al, 2002), we could not establish this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The apparent preferential action of these compounds at peripheral over central D 2 receptors is consistent with results from ex vivo occupancy studies (Kapur et al, 2002). The aripiprazole-induced prolactin release measured in the present study is at variance with published data showing a smaller increase or even a decrease in prolactin levels in rats (Inoue et al, 1996(Inoue et al, , 1998. Although a D 2 agonistic component of aripiprazole would be expected to reduce the prolactin release originating from its D 2 receptor blockade (Marchese et al, 2002), we could not establish this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…At the gene level, Jaber et al [1994] have shown, using quantitative in situ and Northern blot hybridizations, that repeated administration of haloperidol or sulpiride to rats induced significant increases in the mRNAs of both PRL and GH in the pituitary gland. Inoue et al [1998], using a quantitative ribonuclease protection assay for PRL mRNA, also found that oral treatment of rats with haloperidol for 21 days increased the pituitary level of prolactin mRNA. Such findings indicate that the upregulation of GH and PRL produced by EGb 761 may have some relationship to antipsychotic mechanisms (or to antipsychotic drug treatment).…”
Section: Effects Of Dietary Egb 761 On Gene Expression In Rodent Brainmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The doses were extrapolated from the dose relationship between haloperidol and APZ as used in clinical practice and in previous animal trials with haloperidol and clozapine (Fitzgerald et al 1995;Schmitt et al 2003b). The low (10 mg/kg/day) and high (40 mg/kg/day) doses lie in the range of other animal trials with subcutaneaous (Li et al 2005), oral (Inoue et al 1998;Kalinichev et al 2005) (Dr. Kikutichi, personal communication), or intraperitoneal (Cheng et al 2008;Semba et al 1995;Semba et al 1996) routes of application. APZ treatment showed a tendency to induce weight loss in our system (Segnitz et al 2009) in contrast to the animal study of Kalinichev et al (2005) but quite in concert with clinical observations (Englisch et al 2009;Henderson et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%