2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-0362(03)00029-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects on cognitive functioning in 13- to 16-year-olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marihuana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
179
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
179
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prospective clinical studies have provided evidence that prenatal exposure to maternal smoking is associated with deficits in auditory processing among offspring that persist through adolescence (Fried et al, 1997(Fried et al, , 2003McCartney et al, 1994). Recent preclinical work indicates that nicotine exposure during early postnatal development, corresponding to the third trimester of pregnancy in humans, resulted in impaired function of nAChRs in primary auditory cortex localized on neurons that regulate thalamocortical inputs (Liang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prospective clinical studies have provided evidence that prenatal exposure to maternal smoking is associated with deficits in auditory processing among offspring that persist through adolescence (Fried et al, 1997(Fried et al, , 2003McCartney et al, 1994). Recent preclinical work indicates that nicotine exposure during early postnatal development, corresponding to the third trimester of pregnancy in humans, resulted in impaired function of nAChRs in primary auditory cortex localized on neurons that regulate thalamocortical inputs (Liang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled, prospective clinical studies have linked maternal smoking during pregnancy with persistent deficits in general intellectual function and auditory processing in offspring (Fried et al, 1997(Fried et al, , 2003McCartney et al, 1994). Converging evidence from preclinical work has identified nicotine as the chief teratogenic component of tobacco smoke contributing to adverse neurodevelopmental sequelae associated with prenatal exposure to maternal smoking (Slotkin, 2004;Slotkin et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose that inconsistencies between studies could be the consequence of differences in sociodemographic variation between the samples or of cohort effects. For example, we note that the Ottawa Pregnancy Prospective Study investigated a low-risk, predominantly middle class sample (Fried et al, 2003) and the sample tested by Olds et al (1994) consisted of families of predominantly poor, teenage, or unmarried mothers. Both could be considered relatively sociodemographically homogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both prenatal smoking (Batstra, Hadders-Algra, & Neeleman, 2003;Cornelius, Ryan, Day, Goldschmidt, & Willford, 2001;Fried et al, 2003;Kristjansson, Fried, & Watkinson, 1989;Mortensen, Michaelsen, Sanders, & Reinisch, 2005;Olds, Henderson, & Tatelbaum, 1994;Sexton, Fox, & Hebel, 1990) and birth weight (across the entire spectrum of birth weight, ranging up to 4-4.5 kg) (Breslau et al, 1996;Jefferis, Power, & Hertzman, 2002;Shenkin, Starr, & Deary, 2004) may be independent predictors of children's cognitive abilities, although reports have not been consistent. An increasing number of studies show that associations between prenatal smoking and offspring cognitive abilities are accounted for by specific sociodemographic factors such as parental IQ, parental education, SES, and family environment (Baghurst, Tong, Wood-ward, & McMichael, 1992;Breslau, Paneth, Lucia, & Paneth-Pollak, 2005;Fergusson & Lloyd, 1991;Lawlor et al, 2006;MacArthur, Knox, & Lancashire, 2001;McGee & Stanton, 1994;Trasti, Vik, Jakobsen, & Bakketeig, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective clinical studies have linked prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke to reductions in motor and verbal comprehension scores in children assessed at 13 months of age (Gusella and Fried, 1984), reductions in measures of language development, and general intellectual function in children assessed at 3, 4, 5, and 6 years of age (Fried and Watkinson, 1990;Fried et al, 1992), deficits in verbal and nonverbal learning and memory in preadolescents (Cornelius et al, 2001), and reductions in general intelligence in children assessed between 9 and 16 years of age (Fried et al, 1998(Fried et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%