2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of stimulus characteristics during knee joint perturbation on hamstring and quadriceps reflex responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…experiments that measured anterior knee laxity while subjects were relaxed [31][33], should be viewed with caution. Furthermore, a study by Bruhn et al [23] has revealed that hamstring reflex responses are modulated according to the stimulus characteristics, i.e. stretch velocity vs. stimulus amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…experiments that measured anterior knee laxity while subjects were relaxed [31][33], should be viewed with caution. Furthermore, a study by Bruhn et al [23] has revealed that hamstring reflex responses are modulated according to the stimulus characteristics, i.e. stretch velocity vs. stimulus amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the experiment, participants were examined with regard to reflex responses and TT before and after a fatiguing jumping task. The measurements were performed using a knee arthrometer [16], [21]–[23] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EMG onset latencies were defined as the time between onset of TT and onset of significant muscular activity, e.g., the beginning of EMG deflection (average EMG baseline value measured over 100 ms ± 3 standard deviations). Muscle activity was analyzed as described previously . Briefly, the deflection of the TT signal indicated the onset of perturbation and muscle activity was calculated over different time intervals relative to the onset of TT, i.e., 20–40, 40–60, and 60–95 ms using the root mean square of the EMG signal (RMS‐EMG).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). 2,4,12,24 Measurement of Posterior-Anterior Tibial Translation Participants were examined in bipedal stance with the knees in 30˚flexion (0˚¼ full extension). In order to standardize the stance position between the trials, subjects stood on a force plate (sampling frequency: 40 Hz, GKS 1000 1 , IMM Holding GmbH, Mittweida, Germany).…”
Section: Subjects and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%