2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of safety behaviour subtypes in social anxiety disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
82
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
82
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, they respond to partner smiles with artificial rather than genuine smiles (Heerey & Kring, 2007) and have difficulty reciprocating others' intimate disclosures (e.g., Alden & Bieling, 1998;Sparrevohn & Rapee, 2009). A necessary direction for future work would be to examine whether the failure of perceivers to detect a socially anxious target's unique characteristics is related to the adoption of safety behaviors and other efforts at self-concealment (Plasencia et al, 2011;Rodebaugh, 2009a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, they respond to partner smiles with artificial rather than genuine smiles (Heerey & Kring, 2007) and have difficulty reciprocating others' intimate disclosures (e.g., Alden & Bieling, 1998;Sparrevohn & Rapee, 2009). A necessary direction for future work would be to examine whether the failure of perceivers to detect a socially anxious target's unique characteristics is related to the adoption of safety behaviors and other efforts at self-concealment (Plasencia et al, 2011;Rodebaugh, 2009a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second, and not mutually exclusive, possibility is that other people have difficulty forming accurate impressions of socially anxious individuals due to their emotional reserve and nonexpressiveness. In support of the latter possibility, socially anxious individuals report that they engage in self-concealment to prevent others from rejecting them (Rodebaugh, 2009a) and adopt subtle avoidance (safety-seeking) behaviors, such as minimizing selfdisclosure and emotional expression, to prevent feared social outcomes (e.g., Clark & Wells, 1995;Hirsch, Meynen, & Clark, 2004;Plasencia, Alden, & Taylor, 2011;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997;. They also acknowledge that their behavior does not reflect their "true" (authentic) selves (Plasencia et al, 2011).…”
Section: Social Anxiety and First Impressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They tend to view themselves as having low social currency and as holding an especially tenuous position within the social hierarchy (Antony, Rowa, Liss, Swallow, & Swinson, 2005;Moscovitch, Gavric, Merrifield, Bielak, & Moscovitch, 2011;Rodebaugh, 2009;Weisman, Aderka, Marom, Hermesh, & Gilboa-Schechtman, 2011). When their self-evaluative concerns are activated by social threat, they often adopt the use of safety behaviors that function to conceal the self and prevent perceived personal flaws from being exposed to the criticism of others (Moscovitch et al, 2013;Plasencia, Alden, & Taylor, 2011;. Thus, from the perspective of the socially anxious, social mishaps may be particularly threatening by virtue of their power to thrust them unexpectedly into the spotlight, illuminating their deficiencies for all to see (Moscovitch, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For socially anxious people, these disaffiliative tendencies may make them appear unfriendly, cold, and aloof (Leary & Kowalski, 1995;Stangier et al, 2006), thereby creating an unfavorable impression on others (Alden & Bieling, 1998;Pilkonis, 1977). Similarly, the clinical literature demonstrates that using safety behaviors such as saying little and avoiding eye contact can have significant negative intra-and interpersonal consequences (Plasencia, Alden, & Taylor, 2011;. In short, although socially anxious people use protective self-presentation tactics to cope with their anxiety in social life-which in some instances may be an appropriate reaction (Laux & Weber, 1991;Renner, Laux, Schü tz, & Tedeschi, 2004), in doing so they may (at best) avoid failure or embarrassment, or (at worst) bring about the exact outcomes they are so intent on preventing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%