2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of MDMA and scopolamine on working versus reference memory in the radial arm maze task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions of the above studies were that acute MDMA results in working memory impairments. However, it has been argued that these findings do not involve working memory effects, but rather reflect disruptions of reference memory involving the rules or strategies associated with a given task (Harper et al, 2005; 2006; Kay et al, 2010). As an illustration, Kay et al (2010) used a version of the radial arm maze designed to separate working and reference memory and found that MDMA had no effect on the working memory task (arms were always baited for one visit), but impaired the reference memory task (arms that were never baited throughout the experiment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions of the above studies were that acute MDMA results in working memory impairments. However, it has been argued that these findings do not involve working memory effects, but rather reflect disruptions of reference memory involving the rules or strategies associated with a given task (Harper et al, 2005; 2006; Kay et al, 2010). As an illustration, Kay et al (2010) used a version of the radial arm maze designed to separate working and reference memory and found that MDMA had no effect on the working memory task (arms were always baited for one visit), but impaired the reference memory task (arms that were never baited throughout the experiment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both scopolamine and mecamylamine were found to impair working memory functions of rats and monkeys in maze tasks (Beatty and Bierley 1985;Kay et al 2010;Kobayashi et al 1995;Levin et al 1987;Ohno et al 1993;Okaichi et al 1989;Tatsumi et al 2006;Wirsching et al 1984) and delayed matching tasks (e.g. Granon et al 1995;Spinelli et al 2006).…”
Section: Working Memory-studies In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cholinergic influence on working memory in humans and animalsBeatty and Bierley 1985;Kay et al 2010;Okaichi et al 1989;Tatsumi et al 2006;Wirsching et al 1984 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two interesting possibilities include direct and indirect activation of postsynaptic 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 1A receptors, respectively. It is clear from animal studies that 5-HT 2A receptors mediate learning and memory processes (Galizio et al, 2009;Kay et al, 2010;Trigo et al, 2008); however, it is not completely obvious whether 5-HT 2A receptor drugs achieve their facilitating and impairing effects through agonism, antagonism or inverse agonism (Meneses, 2002). Still, there seems to be some consensus that a 5-HT 2A blockade not only improves learning, but reverses poor memory consolidation conditions associated with, among others, dysfunctional serotonergic neurotransmission (Meneses, 2007a, b) as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%