2005
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.m400423-jlr200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of lysolipids on steroid synthesis in cells expressing endogenous LPA2 receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high mRNA and protein expressions of LPAR4 compared with the other receptors during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy, as well as the dynamic changes of LPAR2 and LPAR4 during early pregnancy, probably accounts for the contribution of LPA to different events during the estrous cycle and pregnancy, namely the contribution to P4 secretion or modulation of IFNτ action during early pregnancy. The expression of all LPARs in the bovine CL during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy does not completely agree with the results of Budnik and Brunswig-Spickenheier [48], who showed that LPA exerts its actions on bovine luteal cells only via LPAR2. We hypothesize that during the estrous cycle, LPA originating from the CL might exert potential autocrine and paracrine as well as endocrine roles at the time of CL development and maintenance (during early pregnancy), probably acting via all LPARs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The high mRNA and protein expressions of LPAR4 compared with the other receptors during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy, as well as the dynamic changes of LPAR2 and LPAR4 during early pregnancy, probably accounts for the contribution of LPA to different events during the estrous cycle and pregnancy, namely the contribution to P4 secretion or modulation of IFNτ action during early pregnancy. The expression of all LPARs in the bovine CL during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy does not completely agree with the results of Budnik and Brunswig-Spickenheier [48], who showed that LPA exerts its actions on bovine luteal cells only via LPAR2. We hypothesize that during the estrous cycle, LPA originating from the CL might exert potential autocrine and paracrine as well as endocrine roles at the time of CL development and maintenance (during early pregnancy), probably acting via all LPARs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the present study, we did not find any modulation of the pregnancy recognition signal (IFNτ) action on P4 secretion in the luteal cells of the bovine CL. On the other hand, Budnik and Brunswig-Spickenheier [48] reported that LPA inhibits LH-induced secretion of P4 by bovine CL cells in vitro. In contrast to our cells, the cells used in the study of Budnik and Brunswig-Spickenheier [48] were isolated differently and consisted of the four major kinds of luteal cells, steroidogenic, endothelial, fibroblasts and immune cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the production of progesterone remained unaltered in hCGs and HGL5 cells exposed to S1P, indicating that this lysosphingolipid is irrelevant for FF-HDLinduced steroid synthesis. In this context, it is notable that S1P was previously shown to suppress progesterone synthesis in late-stage luteal cells and Leydig tumor cells stimulated with luteotropic hormone or with cAMP analogue [42]. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that FF-HDL exerts dual effects on ovarian steroidogenesis that are stimulatory by substrate provision and suppressive by S1P signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%