1982
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90295-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of inescapable footshocks and of stimuli previously paired with inescapable footshocks on dopamine turnover in cortical and limbic areas of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
88
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, whereas mild stressors fail to increase DA levels in the NAc and dorsal striatum, they can evoke significant increases in prefrontal cortical DA levels (Abercrombie et al 1989). Similar results have been shown with respect to measures of the DA metabolite DOPAC in the frontal cortex and NAc (Herman et al 1982;cf. Horger and Roth 1996;Tissari et al 1979).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, whereas mild stressors fail to increase DA levels in the NAc and dorsal striatum, they can evoke significant increases in prefrontal cortical DA levels (Abercrombie et al 1989). Similar results have been shown with respect to measures of the DA metabolite DOPAC in the frontal cortex and NAc (Herman et al 1982;cf. Horger and Roth 1996;Tissari et al 1979).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…For example, multiple studies have shown that rodents exposed acutely to a stressor such as tail shock, foot shock or restraint exhibit marked increases in extracellular DA levels in the mPFC and moderate increases in the NAc and/or striatum (Abercrombie et al 1989;Roth et al 1988;Thierry et al 1976; for review, see Finlay and Zigmond 1997). Moreover, whereas mild stressors fail to increase DA levels in the NAc and dorsal striatum, they can evoke significant increases in prefrontal cortical DA (Herman et al 1982; cf. Horger and Roth 1996;Tissari et al 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the time spent on social interaction was reliably diminished in lesioned rats, a finding that is clearly in contrast with the fact that prefrontal transection enhances social interaction in rats Tucci et al, 2000), suggesting that neurotransmitter systems other than the mPFC dopaminergic one are involved in this effect. The reduction of social interaction is difficult to explain, but it could be accounted for by a low attention level or disrupted cognitive processes, which are known to emerge after prefrontal dopamine loss (Lavielle et al, 1979;Herman et al, 1982), leading to lower interest for exploring a conspecific. However, lesioned rats did not show an attentional deficit as revealed by normal (or augmented) responses in the contextual fear conditioning experiment, pointing to a cognitive deficit altering the normal performance in the social interaction task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also ensures that ani mals are exposed to footshock on two occasions and per mits comparison to Bourne et al (1992) where they ex posed rats to swim stress following CS exposure on two occasions. The shock parameters employed were select ed because 30 min of intermittent footshock has been shown to increase dopaminergic activity (Herman et al 1982;Abercrombie et al 1989) and because amphetamine-induced CTA has been demonstrated with a 30-min CS-UCS interval (D 'Mello et al 1977). Thus, our shock procedure employed fewer shocks than used in studies reporting shock-induced attenuation of LiCl CTA (Dess et al 1988;Revusky and Reilly 1989) but more shocks than studies reporting shock-induced facilitation of rotation-or apomorphine-induced CTA (Lasiter and Braun 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%