2012
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00242-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Effects of DNA Supercoiling on Chlamydia Early Promoters Correlate with Expression Patterns in Midcycle

Abstract: Changes in DNA supercoiling levels during the chlamydial developmental cycle have been proposed as a global mechanism to upregulate midcycle genes, but the effects on early genes are not known. We examined the promoters for 10 Chlamydia trachomatis early genes and found that they could be separated into two subsets based on their responses to DNA supercoiling in vitro . Furthermore, the type of supercoiling response correlated with the in vivo … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All reactions were performed as three independent experiments, and the error bars represent standard deviations. Comparison graphs showing the supercoiling response for a supercoiling‐insensitive ( euo ) and a supercoiling‐sensitive ( dna K P 1) promoter are adapted from Cheng and Tan, . B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All reactions were performed as three independent experiments, and the error bars represent standard deviations. Comparison graphs showing the supercoiling response for a supercoiling‐insensitive ( euo ) and a supercoiling‐sensitive ( dna K P 1) promoter are adapted from Cheng and Tan, . B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We treated Chlamydia ‐infected cells with novobiocin for 30 min at 16 hpi, which is before the peak in chlamydial supercoiling at about 18–24 h (Niehus et al ., ), and measured transcript levels of selected genes by quantitative RT‐PCR. In validation experiments, novobiocin treatment decreased transcription of dnaK , groEL , ompA , pgk and fliF , which each have a supercoiling‐sensitive promoter (Niehus et al ., ; Case et al ., ; Cheng and Tan, ), but did not affect rRNA, euo and incD , early genes with supercoiling‐insensitive promoters (Cheng and Tan, ). Transcription of all three chlamydial topoisomerases was decreased by novobiocin treatment, with transcript levels of gyrB , topA and parE reduced to 4.5%, 30.7% and 11% of untreated levels respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, chlamydial genes with supercoiling-responsive promoters have been proposed to be upregulated in midcycle by increased chlamydial DNA supercoiling levels at this stage of the developmental cycle (7,8,11). In contrast, late genes have been proposed to be repressed during early times and midcycle by the transcription factor EUO, until this repression is relieved at late times by an as-yet-undefined mechanism (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA supercoiling, which peaks in midcycle, is proposed to regulate genes with supercoilingresponsive promoters, which include midcycle genes and a subset of early genes (7,8). Late genes consist of two subsets that are transcribed by either the major chlamydial RNA polymerase, which contains the sigma factor 66 , or an alternative RNA polymerase containing 28 (7, 9-11).…”
Section: Chlamydia Is a Pathogenic Bacterium That Is Responsible For mentioning
confidence: 99%