2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of chronic cannabis use on preattentional cognitive functioning in abstinent schizophrenic patients and healthy subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
28
1
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
28
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…General evidence for a different pattern of neurophysiological expression in the MMN component was found for psychosis patients who used cannabis compared to those that did not. Cannabis use did not significantly increase MMN amplitude; however, similar to Rentzsch et al (2011), a relatively consistent pattern emerged across groups for MMN peak amplitude, with patients who used cannabis appearing to lie intermediate between controls (who showed the highest MMN amplitude) and patients who did not use cannabis (who showed the lowest MMN amplitude). These findings parallel neuropsychological findings in the literature, where cannabis-using patients show 'superior' neuropsychological functioning compared to non-using patients (Stirling et al 2005;Jockers-Scherübl et al 2007;de la Serna et al 2010;Yücel et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…General evidence for a different pattern of neurophysiological expression in the MMN component was found for psychosis patients who used cannabis compared to those that did not. Cannabis use did not significantly increase MMN amplitude; however, similar to Rentzsch et al (2011), a relatively consistent pattern emerged across groups for MMN peak amplitude, with patients who used cannabis appearing to lie intermediate between controls (who showed the highest MMN amplitude) and patients who did not use cannabis (who showed the lowest MMN amplitude). These findings parallel neuropsychological findings in the literature, where cannabis-using patients show 'superior' neuropsychological functioning compared to non-using patients (Stirling et al 2005;Jockers-Scherübl et al 2007;de la Serna et al 2010;Yücel et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Most recently, this research group reported that acute administration of subanaesthetic doses of ketamine to healthy volunteers did not affect frequency or duration MMN amplitudes, but coadministration of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist rimonabant resulted in frontally reduced duration MMN (Roser et al 2011). Finally, reduced frontal frequency MMN was reported in long-term cannabis users relative to controls (Rentzsch et al 2011). This study also included schizophrenia patients with and without cannabis use and found increased frontal MMN in the former relative to the latter, and MMN amplitude in the cannabis-using patients did not differ significantly from controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One explanation for this finding might be that processing of sound duration deviants is affected to a larger degree than the processing of sound frequency deviants in PD patients. This explanation is supported by studies showing divergent deficits in duration and frequency MMN amplitudes in other psychiatric conditions [57, 58], likely due to differences in the underlying neuronal networks involved in preattentive deviant sound processing. While frequency deviants seem to be processed in auditory-temporal brain areas, duration deviant processing seems to involve further key brain areas forming greater and more distributed networks [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For example, although social withdrawal in PCP-treated rats is associated with reduced CB 1 activation, working memory deficits in the same animals have been linked to increased activity at CB 1 receptors (Seillier et al, 2010). In addition, alterations of endocannabinoid transmission in control animals via URB597, AM251, or chronic WIN55,212-2 (Spano et al, 2010) produced deleterious effects similar to those observed in PCP-treated rats, suggesting that cannabinoid drugs trigger different behavioral responses in distinct experimental groups, as in the case of schizophrenics vs healthy subjects (Rentzsch et al, 2011). Finally, chronic cannabis consumption has been shown to attenuate negative symptoms in the former group (Compton et al, 2004;Dubertret et al, 2006), but to induce an 'amotivational syndrome' in the latter (Sewell et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%