2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Effect of Targeted Temperature Management Between 32 °C and 36 °C Following Cardiac Arrest According to Initial Severity of Illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, this individual patient meta-analysis provides the best available evidence regarding the use of hypothermia in the management of OHCA patients with an initial nonshockable rhythm. Our subgroup analyses showed no association of hypothermia with improved outcomes in some populations of patients, such as those with a noncardiac cause of arrest (ie, mostly hypoxic/respiratory), prolonged resuscitation, absence of bystander CPR, and higher CAHP score, in whom previous studies suggested potential benefits . Moreover, the trial sequential analysis revealed that the use of hypothermia in this population was associated with futility, ie, the inability of these clinical trials to achieve a statistically significant and/or clinically relevant difference from hypothermia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…As such, this individual patient meta-analysis provides the best available evidence regarding the use of hypothermia in the management of OHCA patients with an initial nonshockable rhythm. Our subgroup analyses showed no association of hypothermia with improved outcomes in some populations of patients, such as those with a noncardiac cause of arrest (ie, mostly hypoxic/respiratory), prolonged resuscitation, absence of bystander CPR, and higher CAHP score, in whom previous studies suggested potential benefits . Moreover, the trial sequential analysis revealed that the use of hypothermia in this population was associated with futility, ie, the inability of these clinical trials to achieve a statistically significant and/or clinically relevant difference from hypothermia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…One interpretation of conflicting clinical trial results is that TTMhypothermia offers less benefit for certain cohorts of adult patients, such as the cardiac population in TTM and TTM2 trials with high probability of good outcome [ 26 , 27 ], but may be more beneficial for other cohorts of patients with lower probability of good outcome, such as the more frequent respiratory arrest population in the HYPERION trial [ 62 ]. Observational studies support a differential treatment effect for TTM-hypothermia across subgroups, and these studies have an advantage over the clinical trials in that they include a more diverse cohort of patients ( Table 2 ) [ 31 , 42 , 75 77 ].…”
Section: Illness Severity Influences Treatment Effect Of Ttm-hypothermiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another analysis used historical factors about the resuscitation in the modified Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis score to define mild (<80), moderate (≥80 and <105), or severe (≥105) risk groups among 2,723 OHCA patients in the Sudden Death Expertise Center registry and 4,202 OHCA patients in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium database [ 77 ]. In both databases and in pooled data, TTM at 33 to 36 °C was associated with both survival and favorable functional recovery in low and severe risk groups, but this association was weaker in moderate-severity groups.…”
Section: Illness Severity Influences Treatment Effect Of Ttm-hypothermiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Lasccarou et al compared the same parameters in patients who were categorized into three stages according to a modified CA hospital prognosis classification for PCAS and showed that the effect of TTM (32–36 °C) depended on disease severity [ 53 ]. An RCT is currently underway to investigate the effect of therapeutic hypothermia for a particular severity group, the results of which are anticipated to further enhance understanding of this matter [ 54 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%