2002
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.76.13.6558-6567.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Effect of Murine Alpha/Beta Interferon Transgenes on Antagonization of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Replication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
51
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
5
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were calculated as DC T , the difference between the gene of interest and the b-actin gene mean thresholds, and expressed as expression levels relative to b-actin. 29 …”
Section: F-means Clustering Analysis Of Gene Expression Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were calculated as DC T , the difference between the gene of interest and the b-actin gene mean thresholds, and expressed as expression levels relative to b-actin. 29 …”
Section: F-means Clustering Analysis Of Gene Expression Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DNA-vaccination studies with different IFN-a subtypes against murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) infection, it was shown that vaccination with IFN-a1, IFN-a4 and IFN-a9 as adjuvants resulted in decreased viral loads after virus challenge in the muscle only, whereas vaccination with IFN-a6 inhibited MCMV replication in all the organs investigated. Two IFN-a subtypes (IFN-a2 and IFN-a5) were not able to reduce viral loads in these experiments (Cull et al, 2002). In contrast to MCMV infection, DNA-vaccination studies against influenza virus infection identified IFN-a5 and IFN-a6 to be the most efficient subtypes in reducing viral titres (James et al, 2007).…”
Section: Ifn-a Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro studies demonstrated that IFN-a1, IFN-a4, IFN-a5, IFN-a6 and IFN-a9 mediate anti-viral activity against herpes simplex virus (Harle et al, 2002), whereas IFN-a11 and IFN-a4 were the best candidates in blocking the replication of mengovirus (van Pesch et al, 2004). In vivo, it was shown that during Friend retrovirus (FV) infection of mice, therapeutic treatment with IFN-a1, IFN-a4, IFN-a9 and IFN-a11 reduced the viral loads significantly, whereas IFN-a2, IFN-a5 and IFN-a6 could not inhibit viral replication (Gerlach et al, 2009;Gibbert et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ifn-a Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse studies have shown that IFN−α1 and IFN−β were both effective in preventing mucosal HSV-1 infection, and that IFN−α2, −α4, −α5, −α6 and −α9 were ineffective [78][79][80]. Furthermore, IFN−β was found to be superior to IFN−α6 in preventing ocular HSV-1 infection in mice, via upregulation of ISG transcripts, 2-5OAS in trigeminal ganglia and increased phosphorylation of STAT1 [81].…”
Section: Ifns and Hsvsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, ICP27 induces the secretion of a type I IFN antagonist that inhibits STAT1 phosphorylation and nuclear localization [90]. However, IFN−β, more so than IFN−α, has been reported to reduce levels of ICP27 transcription as well as thymidine kinase and glycoprotein B, as determined by real-time PCR [78].…”
Section: Ifns and Hsvsmentioning
confidence: 99%