1980
DOI: 10.1093/nar/8.17.3993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effect of aphidicolin on adenovirus DNA synthesis and cellular DNA synthesis

Abstract: There is strong evidence for a participation of DNA polymerase y in the replication of adenovirus (Ad) DNA. To study a possible additional role of DNA polymerase a we measured the effect of aphidicolin on viral DNA replication.In intact cells, aphidicolin inhibits Ad DNA synthesis weakly. The drug concentration required for 50% inhibition of Ad DNA replication was 300-400 fold higher than for a similar effect on cellular DNA synthesis. Such a differential inhibition was also observed in AGMK cells doubly infec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Re-replication is especially extensive in cells infected with the E1B-55K-mutant virus (unpublished observations and Cherubini et al, 2006) and leads to double-stranded DNA breaks and regions of single stranded DNA that trigger the DNA-damage response pathway (Hook et al, 2007; Jones and Petermann, 2012). Because the adenovirus DNA polymerase is unaffected by a level of aphidicolin that blocks cellular DNA synthesis (Kwant and van der Vliet, 1980), double-mutant virus-infected cells were treated with a concentration of aphidicolin sufficient to suppress cellular but not viral DNA replication before measuring nuclear fragmentation (Fig. 8A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-replication is especially extensive in cells infected with the E1B-55K-mutant virus (unpublished observations and Cherubini et al, 2006) and leads to double-stranded DNA breaks and regions of single stranded DNA that trigger the DNA-damage response pathway (Hook et al, 2007; Jones and Petermann, 2012). Because the adenovirus DNA polymerase is unaffected by a level of aphidicolin that blocks cellular DNA synthesis (Kwant and van der Vliet, 1980), double-mutant virus-infected cells were treated with a concentration of aphidicolin sufficient to suppress cellular but not viral DNA replication before measuring nuclear fragmentation (Fig. 8A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad DNA replication in vitro with the aphidicolinresistant DNA polymerase and purified factors remains sensitive to aphidicolin, suggesting a second site of aphidicolin action, possibly one of the host-encoded stimulatory factors. Other investigators have also proposed a second site of aphidicolin action based on the observations that Ad DNA replication in vivo is less sensitive to aphidicolin than is host DNA replication and that the effect of aphidicolin on DNA polymerase a, but not on Ad DNA replication, is competitive with dCTP (16,17). The specific site and mechanism of aphidicolin action in inhibiting Ad DNA replication remain unknown.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initiation reaction is insensitive to ddNTPs, aphidicolin, and (S)-g-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine diphosphoryl, all strong inhibitors of elongation (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Moreover, the K m for dCTP is 3.2-fold lower during initiation (1).…”
Section: Dissociation Is Accompanied With Changes In the Catalytic Prmentioning
confidence: 99%