2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effect of age on the brain fatty acid levels and their correlation with animal cognitive status in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed this median-split based on the theoretical notion that proximity can be used as an index of individual differences in spatial learning among aged animals (Gallagher et al, 1993). We also consulted a similar dichotomization procedure used in previous MWM studies in rodents that focused on separating older subjects into two performance groups with respect to proximity (i.e., separating older subjects who scored above and below the mean cumulative or average proximity value of the younger subjects by 2 to 3 SD s of the young’s mean, see Zamzow, Elias, Acosta, Escobedo, & Magnusson, 2016; Gallagher et al, 1993; Rowe et al, 2007; Yetimler, Ulusoy, Çelik, & Jakubowska-Doğru, 2012). In addition, we examined the distribution of the CCProx values of the older adults [skewness = 0.48 (“0” in a normal distribution); kurtosis = −0.57 (“3” in a normal distribution)].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed this median-split based on the theoretical notion that proximity can be used as an index of individual differences in spatial learning among aged animals (Gallagher et al, 1993). We also consulted a similar dichotomization procedure used in previous MWM studies in rodents that focused on separating older subjects into two performance groups with respect to proximity (i.e., separating older subjects who scored above and below the mean cumulative or average proximity value of the younger subjects by 2 to 3 SD s of the young’s mean, see Zamzow, Elias, Acosta, Escobedo, & Magnusson, 2016; Gallagher et al, 1993; Rowe et al, 2007; Yetimler, Ulusoy, Çelik, & Jakubowska-Doğru, 2012). In addition, we examined the distribution of the CCProx values of the older adults [skewness = 0.48 (“0” in a normal distribution); kurtosis = −0.57 (“3” in a normal distribution)].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximity measures were corrected for start position (Das et al 2012). Based on reference memory acquisition performance in the place trials, the old mice were divided into two categories for BReference memory-Good^(RG; N = 7) and BReference memory-Bad^(RB; N = 5) learners as previously described (Lee et al 1994;Rowe et al 2007;Yetimler et al 2012) with some modifications. The criteria for RB old learners were established by selecting old mice with average 2-day reference scores that were 2 standard deviations above the mean of the young mice, while RG old learners were within the same 2 standard deviation window (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While aging-related decline in DHA levels was observed in various rodent brain regions (Lopez et al, 1995; Little et al, 2007; Barcelo-Coblijn et al, 2003; Favrelier et al, 2000), others found lack of such effects (Yetmler et al, 2012). Some human studies indicated that aging has no appreciable influence on DHA contents in cerebral cortex (Carver et al, 2001), frontal cortex, hippocampus and pons (Soderberg M, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%