2001
DOI: 10.1006/jare.2001.0792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential drought tolerance of five coexisting plant species in Mediterranean lowland grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In stark contrast with our hypotheses, we found that drought most reduced both aboveground and root biomass of A. odoratum and L. hispidus -the species that we hypothesized would be least affected by drought because of their slow growth rates. Interestingly, and in contrast with earlier field-based observations (Mamolos et al 2001), in a glasshouse-based study similar in scale and duration to ours, Padilla et al (2013) found no effect of pulsed water supply on both biomass and root traits of A. odoratum. However, these authors only sampled at one time point, and might therefore have missed a dynamic change in root traits.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In stark contrast with our hypotheses, we found that drought most reduced both aboveground and root biomass of A. odoratum and L. hispidus -the species that we hypothesized would be least affected by drought because of their slow growth rates. Interestingly, and in contrast with earlier field-based observations (Mamolos et al 2001), in a glasshouse-based study similar in scale and duration to ours, Padilla et al (2013) found no effect of pulsed water supply on both biomass and root traits of A. odoratum. However, these authors only sampled at one time point, and might therefore have missed a dynamic change in root traits.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we hypothesized that R. acetosa would be resistant to drought because of its high RTD and low SRL. However, and in contrast with findings from field studies on R. obtusifolius (Gilgen et al 2010) and R. acetosella (Mamolos et al 2001), drought consistently reduced both aboveground and root biomass of R. acetosa over the entire duration of our experiment. An explanation for these discrepancies might be that in the field, Rumex species take advantage of their deep taproot system to maintain water uptake and photosynthesis during drought (Gilgen et al 2010), whereas in our relatively small pots, R. acetosa was not able to fulfill its ecological niche.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Mediterranean grasslands, however, may be more resistant to increasing drought severity and frequency than predicted [174]. Scenarios of increasing drought suggest that Mediterranean grasslands could lose species diversity by affecting particular species [175]. Grazing management should be reconsidered to provide appropriate levels of grazing pressure, because the impacts of grazing on grassland biomass and diversity can be very detrimental and can endanger the capacity of grassland services, and should be reconsidered to allow further grazing, especially in a scenario of increased aridity [176,177].…”
Section: Forests Versus Shrublands and Grasslandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of drought impact on grassland phenology is obtained through species-specific studies. For instance, Mamolos et al [30] recorded an earlier maximum aboveground biomass of early-season species in response to drought in a Mediterranean lowland grassland. A case study in Switzerland indicates that the full flowering of dandelion and cocksfoot grass was 11 days earlier under spring drought than the annual mean flowering [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%