2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential distribution and lateralization of infant gestures and their relation to maternal gestures in the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Research from Tronick's lab on infants in the middle of the first year has demonstrated that under relational stress, 6‐month‐old infants use left‐sided gestures generated by the right hemisphere. They interpreted this data as being “consistent with Schore's (2005) hypotheses of hemispheric right‐sided activation of emotions and their regulation during infant–mother interactions” (Montirosso, Cozzi, Tronick, & Borgatti, , p. 826). Using near‐infrared spectroscopy, Minagawa‐Kawai and her colleagues' fMRI study of infant–mother attachment at the end of the first year observed, “Our results are in agreement with that of Schore () who addressed the importance of the right hemisphere in the attachment system” (2009, p. 289).…”
Section: Further Implications For Early Assessments Of Boys At Risksupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Research from Tronick's lab on infants in the middle of the first year has demonstrated that under relational stress, 6‐month‐old infants use left‐sided gestures generated by the right hemisphere. They interpreted this data as being “consistent with Schore's (2005) hypotheses of hemispheric right‐sided activation of emotions and their regulation during infant–mother interactions” (Montirosso, Cozzi, Tronick, & Borgatti, , p. 826). Using near‐infrared spectroscopy, Minagawa‐Kawai and her colleagues' fMRI study of infant–mother attachment at the end of the first year observed, “Our results are in agreement with that of Schore () who addressed the importance of the right hemisphere in the attachment system” (2009, p. 289).…”
Section: Further Implications For Early Assessments Of Boys At Risksupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The Still‐Face episode is considered informative of the infant's socio‐emotional response to a relational and communicative perturbation (Montirosso, Provenzi, et al., ; Provenzi, Borgatti, Menozzi, & Montirosso, ). The expected pattern of socio‐emotional regulation in response to the FFSF includes increased negative emotionality (Adamson & Frick, ) and the adoption of two main kinds of regulatory behaviors (Montirosso, Cozzi, Tronick, Borgatti, ). Self‐directed regulatory behaviors (e.g., looking away, self‐comforting, and self‐stimulating) are used by infants to modulate their levels of arousal and affect.…”
Section: Developmental Care For Very Preterm Infants and Their Mothersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the Play episode allows for assessment of the interactive tendencies of the infant, whereas the Still-Face and Reunion are informative regarding the infant's reactivity to, and recovery from, relational perturbation, respectively (Mesman, van Ijzendoorn, & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2009). Compared with the initial interaction episode, there is generally an increase in mean levels of negative facial expressions and decreases in mean levels of infant smiling and gazes toward the parent during the Still-Face episode (the so called, Still-Face effect; Adamson & Frick, 2003;Montirosso, Cozzi, Tronick, & Borgatti, 2012). Beyond this general trend, however, there is considerable individual variability in infant reactions during the procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%