Differential Diagnostic Potential of Otoacoustic Emissions: A Case Study

Lutman, Mark E.; Mason, Steve; Sheppard, Sarah; Gibbin, K. P.

doi:10.3109/00206098909081625

Cited by 52 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Zwicker and Schorn-and Schom.l'' the recording of BOBs excludes with a "very high probability" a peripheral hearing loss that might influence the development of speech. Our case, as well as the three cases [13][14][15] previously reported in the English-language medical literature, demonstrates that the recording ofEOEs in patients with severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss is a rare but not impossible event. Such a condition might be due to retrocochlear disease, neural damage, or inner hair cell damage.…”

Section: Case Reportmentioning

confidence: 58%

Bilateral Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Child with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss

Laccourreye¹,

Huy²,

François³

et al. 1996

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recording of bilateral evoked otoacoustic emissions in a 3-year-old girl with bilateral profound hearing loss is presented. No component of auditory-evoked brain stem potentials was recorded. Findings on computed tomography of the inner ear were within normal limits. At retest 3 months later, these results were unchanged. Explanations for this particular condition are presented together with a review of the literature.

show abstract

Section: Case Reportmentioning

confidence: 58%

Bilateral Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Child with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss

Laccourreye¹,

Huy²,

François³

et al. 1996

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More recently, OAEs have added in our diagnostic capabilities since the combination of ABR and OAEs permits the differentiation between cochlear or sensory and purely retrocochlear or neural hearing losses [25,26]. As a result, researchers became able to identify cases characterized by normal OAEs but impaired neural transmission of auditory pathways as expressed by severe ABR abnormalities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Transient infantile auditory neuropathy and its clinical implications

Psarommatis

Riga

Douros

et al. 2006

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Lutman et al (7) reported a patient with a profound sensorineural hearing loss with a presence of click-evoked OAEs. Prieve et al (8) and Katona et al (9) reported similar cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostic Potential of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Severe or Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Park¹

1998

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the potential of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in differential diagnosis of hearing loss, these were routinely measured in 232 ears of severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Normally recordable DPOAEs were found in 16 ears (8 patients) and the results were confirmed through retests after intervals; positive responses of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were additionally tested. The findings suggest that nerve deafness and hair cell deafness may be partly distinguishable.

show abstract

Differential Diagnostic Potential of Otoacoustic Emissions: A Case Study

Cited by 52 publications

References 15 publications

Bilateral Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Child with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss

Bilateral Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Child with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss

Transient infantile auditory neuropathy and its clinical implications

Diagnostic Potential of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Severe or Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About