1973
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(73)90036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential cross sections for K+n elastic scattering between 0.64 and 1.51 GeV/c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11, we show the differential cross section of the K + n elastic scattering with the experimental data taken from Refs. [32,38]. We find fairly nice reproduction, especially for p lab =640, 720 and 780 MeV/c, the agreement between the calculation and data is quite good both in magnitude and angular dependence.…”
Section: Unitarized Amplitude and Possible Resonance In I =supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11, we show the differential cross section of the K + n elastic scattering with the experimental data taken from Refs. [32,38]. We find fairly nice reproduction, especially for p lab =640, 720 and 780 MeV/c, the agreement between the calculation and data is quite good both in magnitude and angular dependence.…”
Section: Unitarized Amplitude and Possible Resonance In I =supporting
confidence: 68%
“…We find fairly nice reproduction, especially for p lab =640, 720 and 780 MeV/c, the agreement between the calculation and data is quite good both in magnitude and angular dependence. These data are from the same experiment [38]. For the other lab momenta, which are from different experiment [32], the agreement is marginal especially for lower energies.…”
Section: Unitarized Amplitude and Possible Resonance In I =mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are only slightly more than half of the number of data points compared to the T=1 case and the reliability of the data is less, given that it must be extracted from deuteron data with corrections. Again most of the data can be obtained from compilations [30,31,32] but we try to give references to original papers [28,45,46,53,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. Normally the neutron result is obtained assuming that the interactions of the kaon with the proton and neutron are independent.…”
Section: A Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscript i denotes the K+ -proton and K+ -neutron interactions. For P-shell nuclei with A::;:16 described with the harmonic oscillator wave functions, the amplitude (2) is (5) where PI (6) q!(p-q)! is the binomial coefficient, and (7) Here a and a' are the length parameters of harmonic oscillator wave functions for s and p shell nucleons.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, microscopic calculations based on the impulse approximation (KMT multiple scattering theory 1 > or Glauber theory 2 >) are expected to work in explaining K+ scattering on nuclei A. In spite of these facts, the differential cross sections for K+ -A scattering on 12 C and 4°C a measured 3 > at Rab=800 MeV /c more than ten years ago have not been reproduced 4 > by conventional calculations with the K+ N phase shifts given by Giacomelli et al 5 > and Martin. 6 > For the past decade, great efforfHo> has been made in realizing agreement with data, considering higher corrections such as two-body correlation effects arising from nuclear deformation, double spin-flip and double isospin-fiip, off-shell effects and binding effects of nucleons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%