1983
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(83)90368-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential cross sections and analyzing powers for pd elastic scattering below 1.0 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise calculations for p-d scattering [2,3] below the deuteron breakup threshold including the Coulomb potential rigorously have recently become possible to perform. These calculations find [3,4] that a similar underprediction exists here for A y and also iT 11 . The agreement for other observables, including cross sections, T 20 , T 21 , T 22 , and n-d scattering lengths [5] is generally excellent.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Precise calculations for p-d scattering [2,3] below the deuteron breakup threshold including the Coulomb potential rigorously have recently become possible to perform. These calculations find [3,4] that a similar underprediction exists here for A y and also iT 11 . The agreement for other observables, including cross sections, T 20 , T 21 , T 22 , and n-d scattering lengths [5] is generally excellent.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…We used p-d elastic scattering for which multiple absolute measurements of differential cross sections exist at energies near the range of interest for our measurements [17,18,19]. The data of Brune et al [18] was taken with the explicit purpose of normalizing relative differential cross-section data taken with the same equipment as the present work.…”
Section: A Normalization Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data are taken from Refs. [29,30,31,32,33,34], as indicated in detail in the figure captions. By inspection of the figures, we can observe that: (i) theory and experiment are in disagreement for the A y and iT 11 Exp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the Data are from Ref. [29] at E cm = 0.266 MeV, from Ref. [30] at E cm = 0.431 MeV, from Refs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%