1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.57.972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Cross Section for Coherent Photon Scattering fromHe4at 180 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6.3 below. As was already found in the very first measurements at Bates (MIT) [20,23], any version of the ∆-hole model -the original version of Ref. [107], a simplified version [109] based on a local-density approximation, and a version [108] corrected [46] for the seagull contributions to the elementary γN scattering amplitude -fails to explain the large size of the differential cross section observed at angles θ LAB > ∼ 90 • .…”
Section: Compton Scattering By 4 He In the ∆ Rangementioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6.3 below. As was already found in the very first measurements at Bates (MIT) [20,23], any version of the ∆-hole model -the original version of Ref. [107], a simplified version [109] based on a local-density approximation, and a version [108] corrected [46] for the seagull contributions to the elementary γN scattering amplitude -fails to explain the large size of the differential cross section observed at angles θ LAB > ∼ 90 • .…”
Section: Compton Scattering By 4 He In the ∆ Rangementioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, all the considered models fail to correctly describe the experimental results at large angles, where the 4 He data [20,23,29,45,46] largely exceed the predictions. Comparing the different calculations, one may conclude that the density-dependent self-energy of the ∆ which results in a shift and broadening of the ∆ peak is not the only effect which has to be taken into account to explain nuclear Compton scattering in the ∆ range.…”
Section: Missing Effects At Large Angles -Nonlocalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations