2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.09.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential coupling of the human cannabinoid receptors hCB1R and hCB2R to the G-protein Gαi2β1γ2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, F and G). This is in good agreement with ratios determined for other G i/o -coupled receptors in Sf9 cell membranes, for example the hH 4 R (Schneider et al, 2009), human cannabinoid receptors CB 1 and CB 2 (Nickl et al, 2008), and the human formyl peptide receptor (Wenzel- Seifert et al, 1998). Table 1).…”
Section: Immunological Detection Of Recombinant Proteinssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2, F and G). This is in good agreement with ratios determined for other G i/o -coupled receptors in Sf9 cell membranes, for example the hH 4 R (Schneider et al, 2009), human cannabinoid receptors CB 1 and CB 2 (Nickl et al, 2008), and the human formyl peptide receptor (Wenzel- Seifert et al, 1998). Table 1).…”
Section: Immunological Detection Of Recombinant Proteinssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We preformed a sequence alignment between mouse CB 1 and mouse CB 2 , and highlighted in red the sequence motifs located in the intracellular loops that may account for the differential interactions with G proteins and found that these regions exhibit a much diminished 29% similarity (Figure S3). In agreement with this reduced amino acid similarity in intracellular sequences, a recent study showed that the binding of the same agonist to either CB 1 or CB 2 receptors leads to differential activation of G-proteins [33]. Another possible explanation of how the same agonist engaging either CB 1 or CB 2 receptors might differentially activate a signal transduction mechanism is based on studies that were obtained with “ligand-assisted protein structure” (LAPS) analysis [34], [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the concept of constitutive GPCR activity was developed. This concept assumes that receptors exist in an inactive (R) and an active (R*) state and that they isomerize between Nickl et al (2008) Most studies regarding the effects of monovalent ions were performed with G i /G o -coupled receptors. It should be emphasised that the majority of relevant studies were performed with membrane preparations, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%