2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-8479-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential column measurements using compact solar-tracking spectrometers

Abstract: Abstract. We demonstrate the use of compact solar-tracking Fourier transform spectrometers (Bruker EM27/SUN) for differential measurements of the column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of CH 4 and CO 2 within urban areas. Using Allan variance analysis, we show that the differential column measurement has a precision of 0.01 % for X CO 2 and X CH 4 with an optimum integration time of 10 min, corresponding to Allan deviations of 0.04 ppm and 0.2 ppb, respectively. The sensor system is very stable over time and a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
147
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we find agreement between two DCS instruments that is an order of magnitude better and is comparable to that achieved with highly calibrated, state-of-the-art solar-looking FTS systems that retrieve vertical column measurements (Messerschmidt et al, 2011;Frey et al, 2015;Hedelius et al, 2016); how-ever, open-path DCS does not require instrument-specific calibrations (e.g., of the instrument line shape) and provides a very different capability by retrieving the dry mole fractions across regional, kilometer-scale paths over day and night on a mobile platform. Moreover, as the agreement between openpath DCS instruments is below the level of natural background fluctuations, future measurements can facilitate accurate inverse modeling to identify sources and sinks of carbon emission over regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we find agreement between two DCS instruments that is an order of magnitude better and is comparable to that achieved with highly calibrated, state-of-the-art solar-looking FTS systems that retrieve vertical column measurements (Messerschmidt et al, 2011;Frey et al, 2015;Hedelius et al, 2016); how-ever, open-path DCS does not require instrument-specific calibrations (e.g., of the instrument line shape) and provides a very different capability by retrieving the dry mole fractions across regional, kilometer-scale paths over day and night on a mobile platform. Moreover, as the agreement between openpath DCS instruments is below the level of natural background fluctuations, future measurements can facilitate accurate inverse modeling to identify sources and sinks of carbon emission over regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…8. Initially, the Allan deviations do follow this slope, but the atmospheric concentrations, especially of CO 2 , vary over this 6 h period, and the Allan deviations reach a floor at ∼ 1000 s. As in Chen et al (2016) it is also useful to plot the Allan deviation of the difference in retrieved concentration between the instruments, e.g., XCO 2 and XCH 4 of Fig. 6.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieved Mole Fractions From Dcs a And Dcs Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instruments were then deployed to Chino to develop a methodology to estimate greenhouses gas emissions and improve the uncertainties on flux estimates from this major local source. Descriptions of the capacities and limitations of the mobile EM27/SUN instruments have been published in Chen et al (2016) and Hedelius et al (2016). Using Allan analysis, it has been found out that the precision of the differential column measurements ranges between 0.1 and 0.2 ppb with a 10 min averaging time .…”
Section: Mobile Column Measurements: Em27/sunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used to quantify emissions from regional to urban scales (Wunch et al, 2009;Stremme et al, 2013;Kort et al, 2014;Lindenmaier et al, 2014;Hase et al, 2015;Franco et al, 2015;Wong et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Kille et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation