2013
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults

Abstract: Patients over the age of 80 years had lower speech perception scores than other adult CI recipients but did not have higher rates of dizziness or vertigo after surgery. A family history of hearing loss was associated with a trend toward better speech recognition, possibly representing a new prognostic variable. These findings provide important information that will aid clinicians in counseling older CI candidates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
94
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
94
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies report that older and younger implanted adults do equally well on tests using single words or sentences in quiet listening conditions (Budenz et al, 2011;Haensel et al, 2005;Labadie et al, 2000;Migirov et al, 2010;Noble et al, 2009;Orabi et al, 2006;Park et al, 2011;Pasanisi et al, 2003;Poissant et al, 2008;Sterkers et al, 2004), yet others demonstrate significantly lower performance for older compared with younger CI listeners (Chan et al, 2007;Friedland, RungeSamuelson, Baig, & Jensen, 2010;Noble et al, 2009;Roberts, Lin, Herrmann, & Lee, 2013;Vermeire et al, 2005). Perhaps even more surprising is that studies also disagree about the presence of age-related speech-in-noise (SIN) performance differences between older and younger implanted adults.…”
Section: Age-related Performance Differences Among Adults With Cismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies report that older and younger implanted adults do equally well on tests using single words or sentences in quiet listening conditions (Budenz et al, 2011;Haensel et al, 2005;Labadie et al, 2000;Migirov et al, 2010;Noble et al, 2009;Orabi et al, 2006;Park et al, 2011;Pasanisi et al, 2003;Poissant et al, 2008;Sterkers et al, 2004), yet others demonstrate significantly lower performance for older compared with younger CI listeners (Chan et al, 2007;Friedland, RungeSamuelson, Baig, & Jensen, 2010;Noble et al, 2009;Roberts, Lin, Herrmann, & Lee, 2013;Vermeire et al, 2005). Perhaps even more surprising is that studies also disagree about the presence of age-related speech-in-noise (SIN) performance differences between older and younger implanted adults.…”
Section: Age-related Performance Differences Among Adults With Cismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps even more surprising is that studies also disagree about the presence of age-related speech-in-noise (SIN) performance differences between older and younger implanted adults. That is, some studies have demonstrated that older implanted adults perform lower on SIN than younger implanted adults (Lin, Thorpe, Gordon-Salant, & Ferrucci, 2011;Roberts et al, 2013) yet others have reported that age-related differences are absent (Budenz, et al, 2011;Friedland et al, 2010, Orabi et al, 2006Poissant et al, 2008). Adding to the complexity of aging effects on implant use are studies such as Noble et al (2009) Ventry & Weinstein, 1982), the Hearing Handicap Questionnaire (HHQ; Noble, Tyler, Dunn, & Bhullar, 2008), and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ; Gatehouse & Noble, 2004).…”
Section: Age-related Performance Differences Among Adults With Cismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mit zunehmendem Alter der Patienten bei der CI-Versorgung nimmt die Leistung im Hör-und Sprachverständ-nis ab [18]. Die Untersuchungsergebnisse von Blamey et al [3] …”
Section: Ci-nutzungsdauerunclassified