2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential changes in grain ultrastructure, amylase, protein and amino acid profiles between Tibetan wild and cultivated barleys under drought and salinity alone and combined stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D and F). These starch granules in the early developmental stage of caryopsis are considered as A‐type starch granules . The number and size of starch granules increased at 18 DAA compared with those at 12 DAA (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D and F). These starch granules in the early developmental stage of caryopsis are considered as A‐type starch granules . The number and size of starch granules increased at 18 DAA compared with those at 12 DAA (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu reported that DS significantly decreases the proportion of A‐type to B‐type starch granules, amylopectin content, and starch and grain yield . DS also influences starch size distribution and branch chain length in barley grains during anthesis . Although studies showed that starch from drought‐treated wheat contains low amylose, Zhang et al showed that DS does not affect amylose content after anthesis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other settings, salinity limits crop varieties suitable for irrigated soils and affects crop development and yield (Katerji et al, 2003). It also affects river, stream, and wetland ecosystems (Hart et al, 1990), impacts of climate change on river ecosystems (Suen and Lai, 2013), river diversions and ecology (Das et al, 2012), river environmental flow requirements (Sun et al, 2009), tolerance of macro-invertebrate and the ecosystem protection trigger values (Dunlop et al, 2008), sustainability of agricultural landscapes, carbon sequestration and biodiversity values (George et al, 2012), vegetation-groundwater interactions (Humphries et al, 2011), pesticide toxicity, ecosystem functions and ecosystem services (Schafer et al, 2012), bioavailability of Cu and Zn and other essential plant micronutrients (Speelmans et al, 2010), and causes changes in grain ultrastructure, amylase, protein and amino acid profiles under water, salinity, and combined stresses (Ahmed et al, 2013). These myriad ecosystem health linkages do imply that under shallow groundwater conditions salinity has implications for river basin health and ecosystems and thus imposes carrying capacity constrains in terms of water-savings and unlocking the potential of groundwater development for irrigation.…”
Section: Managing Salinity For Protecting Ecosystem Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased Car content might actively participate in ROS detoxification with pro longed drought stress. It is widely accepted that protein content is an important indicator of reversible and irreversible changes in metabolism, which respond to a wide variety of stressors [28,29]. Zadra nik et al [28] reported that the levels of a number of proteins involved in various cellular pathways are affected during drought stress in common bean.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%