2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential and temporal expression of corticotropin releasing hormone and its receptors in the nucleus of the hippocampal commissure and paraventricular nucleus during the stress response in chickens (Gallus gallus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that there was no difference between the BPTES-injected control and BPTES-injected EHC group body temperatures ( P = 0.93) during the heat challenge, indicating that glutamatergic transmission affecting thermal regulation was not damaged by the in-ovo injection of BPTES in the embryonic period. In addition to body temperature, we measured mRNA expression, in the hypothalamus 6 h into the heat challenge, of heat and stress related genes including: HSP70 which is an indicator of the chick’s heat sensitivity ( Kisliouk et al, 2017 ); brain derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF) which is epigenetically regulated during heat conditioning ( Katz and Meiri, 2006 ; Kisliouk and Meiri, 2009 ); glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper ( GILZ ), involved in glucocorticoids anti-inflammatory effect ( Riccardi, 2015 ); eukaryotic initiation factor 2b5 ( EIF2B5 ) involved in the epigenetic regulation of thermal control establishment ( Kisliouk et al, 2009 ); and corticotrophin release hormone receptors ( CRHR ) 1 and 2 which are increased in the hypothalamus of chicks during food deprivation ( Kadhim et al, 2019 ). The expression of each group was normalized to the expression in a parallel t 0 group which was not subjected to heat challenge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that there was no difference between the BPTES-injected control and BPTES-injected EHC group body temperatures ( P = 0.93) during the heat challenge, indicating that glutamatergic transmission affecting thermal regulation was not damaged by the in-ovo injection of BPTES in the embryonic period. In addition to body temperature, we measured mRNA expression, in the hypothalamus 6 h into the heat challenge, of heat and stress related genes including: HSP70 which is an indicator of the chick’s heat sensitivity ( Kisliouk et al, 2017 ); brain derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF) which is epigenetically regulated during heat conditioning ( Katz and Meiri, 2006 ; Kisliouk and Meiri, 2009 ); glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper ( GILZ ), involved in glucocorticoids anti-inflammatory effect ( Riccardi, 2015 ); eukaryotic initiation factor 2b5 ( EIF2B5 ) involved in the epigenetic regulation of thermal control establishment ( Kisliouk et al, 2009 ); and corticotrophin release hormone receptors ( CRHR ) 1 and 2 which are increased in the hypothalamus of chicks during food deprivation ( Kadhim et al, 2019 ). The expression of each group was normalized to the expression in a parallel t 0 group which was not subjected to heat challenge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection from PVN to nHpC may involve both CRH and AVT, as AVT + terminals have been described in nHpC and it expresses V1aR, V1bR, CRHR1 and CRHR2 receptors (although the latter two could be for detection of locally-released CRH; Kadhim et al, 2020 ; Montagnese et al, 2016 ; Nagarajan et al, 2017a ). There is currently no known mammalian equivalent of the nHpC, although the mammalian medial or triangular septal nuclei have been suggested as candidates ( Kadhim et al, 2019 , 2020 ). nHpC contains CRH + neurons, which are activated in response to acute restraint stress ( Ball et al, 1989 ; Nagarajan et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Hypothalamic and Subpallial Telencephalic Afferents To The Pvnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to food deprivation, the CRH expression in nHpC increases initially, but then drops again after 4–8 h, while CRH in PVN increases steadily throughout this period. This indicates that nHpC may play a role in the initial activation of the HPA axis (at least in response to food deprivation) ( Kadhim et al, 2019 ; Nagarajan et al, 2017b ). Electrical stimulation in the nHpC of ducks ( Anas platyrhynchos ) results in defecation, which could be in response to an acute stress response, although no other fear behaviours were observed ( Phillips, 1964 ).…”
Section: Hypothalamic and Subpallial Telencephalic Afferents To The Pvnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In chicken, CRH neurones in the nucleus of the hippocampal commissure initiate, while PVN CRH neurones sustain the early response of the HPA axis to stress (Kadhim et al 2019). In rodents and humans, through mineralocorticoid receptors, hippocampus is highly involved in negative feedback regulation of the HPA axis (Reul et al 1990).…”
Section: Cortical Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%