1991
DOI: 10.1128/iai.59.3.907-912.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential adherence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic Candida albicans yeast cells to mouse tissues

Abstract: Using an ex vivo binding assay, we previously demonstrated that yeast cells grown at 37 degrees C display binding specificity in mouse spleen, lymph node, and kidney tissues. In spleen and lymph node tissues, binding was predominantly in regions rich in macrophages. Here, we tested the possibility that hydrophobic and hydrophilic cells bind differentially to host tissues. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells of four Candida albicans strains were incubated for 15 min at 4 degrees C with cryostat sections of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
109
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adhesion of C. albicans is known to be a complex, multifactorial property dependent on a multiplicity of recognition systems and surface receptors such as surface integrin-like molecules [23,24]. In addition, general biophysical properties of the cell such as cell surface hydrophobicity [25] and electrostatic charge [26,27] can a¡ect adhesion. Therefore it is not surprising that pepstatin A treatment and the disruption of individual SAP genes had only a partial e¡ect on yeast cell adherence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adhesion of C. albicans is known to be a complex, multifactorial property dependent on a multiplicity of recognition systems and surface receptors such as surface integrin-like molecules [23,24]. In addition, general biophysical properties of the cell such as cell surface hydrophobicity [25] and electrostatic charge [26,27] can a¡ect adhesion. Therefore it is not surprising that pepstatin A treatment and the disruption of individual SAP genes had only a partial e¡ect on yeast cell adherence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A somewhat smaller reduction in adherence in the presence of pepstatin A was observed for cells attaching to Matrigel and human BECs. It is likely that interactions between C. albicans yeast cells and these surfaces involves speci¢c receptor-ligand interactions such as those mediated via speci¢c mannan residues, RGD peptides and integrin interactions [24] as well as hydrophobic interactions [25], all of which are likely to be una¡ected by pepstatin A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms by which CSH modulates virulence appear myriad. Hydrophobic cells compared to hydrophilic cells are more adherent to epithelial and endothelial cells as well as extracellular matrix proteins and are more resistant to phagocytic killing [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Hyphae, which have been shown to enhance virulence, are also highly hydro-phobic while the parent yeast cell may become hydrophilic [9,10].…”
Section: Expression Of Cell Surface Hydrophobicity (Csh) Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these proteins confer to the fungal cells the capacity to adhere to the host cells or to inanimate substrata, increase the resistance against macrophages and germination competence 7 , that is essential to the establishment of chronic lesions. Also, C. albicans cells with high cell surface hydrophobicity rates, so-called hydrophobic cells, present increased chances of adherence to different host tissues compared with cells with low rates, or that are hydrophilic 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%