2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential activation of LFA-1 and Mac-1 ligand binding domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybridomas of mAb KIM185 (specific for integrin β2 and activating), 18 mAb KIM127 (specific for integrin β2; reporter mAb for an extended β2 integrin), 21,22 and IB4 (specific for the heterodimeric form of β2 integrins) 19,44,45 (c), denatured BSA was used as ligand, as described previously. 36 In all experiments, the β2 integrin heterodimer-specific and function-blocking mAb IB4 was included to demonstrate β2-integrin-mediated binding specificity.…”
Section: Antibodies and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybridomas of mAb KIM185 (specific for integrin β2 and activating), 18 mAb KIM127 (specific for integrin β2; reporter mAb for an extended β2 integrin), 21,22 and IB4 (specific for the heterodimeric form of β2 integrins) 19,44,45 (c), denatured BSA was used as ligand, as described previously. 36 In all experiments, the β2 integrin heterodimer-specific and function-blocking mAb IB4 was included to demonstrate β2-integrin-mediated binding specificity.…”
Section: Antibodies and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logical expected impact of cytohesin-1 inhibition or silencing was inhibition of Mac-1 activation, as cytohesin-1 interacts with the ␤ 2 -chain shared by all of the ␤ 2 integrins. LFA-1 and Mac-1 present several structural differences, allowing differential regulation and functioning via the cytoplasmic domains of their respective ␣-chain [60,61]. In fact, LFA-1 molecules are implicated in slow rolling and arrests, whereas Mac-1 maintains stable adhesion over minutes of applied shear flow [62] and is required for crawling [43].…”
Section: Figure 8 Effect Of Cytohesin-1 Inhibition On Cell Surface Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last helix in the open conformer is shifted downward compared with the closed conformer ( Figure 4F). Apparently, this conform-ational change also involves disrupting the interaction between an isoleucine residue in the last helix and a hydrophobic pocket in the I domain known as the SILEN (socket for isoleucine; Figure 4F) [7,[65][66][67][68][69]. It has been shown that locking the last helix of the I domain in the closed or open conformation using engineered disulfide bonds induces low or high ligand-binding affinity respectively in both the integrin αMβ2 and its isolated I domain [64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positions of the co-ordinating residues in the α I domain MIDAS are also different between the two conformers ( Figure 4G). However, SILEN may not serve as the primary allosteric switch in all I domains because a mutation that disrupted SILEN in the integrin αM I domain, but not the αL I domain, was activating [69]. Thus the downward movement of the last helix in the α I domain regulates the ligand-binding affinity of its MIDAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%