1990
DOI: 10.1139/g90-025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential action of restriction endonucleases on chromosomes prepared for light and electron microscopy

Abstract: Whole mounted chromosomes from the L929 mouse cell line were digested on grids with HinfI and AluI restriction endonucleases and studied by electron microscopy. Results show differences in the pattern of bands obtained in a marker chromosome when compared with those previously reported by light microscopy with the same restriction endonucleases. These differences suggest that the accessibility of restriction sites on chromosomes may be modulated by preparatory methods for chromosome analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have pointed out that a number of factors may deeply influence the action of RE on chromatin in toto, so that a direct correlation between the obtained banding patterns and the distribution of the target sequences could not always be detected (Gosalvez et al, 1990). In spite of this, in many cases molecular data and the results obtained by the RE in situ have shown a high degree of correlation, particularly when the presence and localization of highly repeated DNAs are considered (Bianchi et al, 1985;De Stefano et al, 1985;Ferrucci et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have pointed out that a number of factors may deeply influence the action of RE on chromatin in toto, so that a direct correlation between the obtained banding patterns and the distribution of the target sequences could not always be detected (Gosalvez et al, 1990). In spite of this, in many cases molecular data and the results obtained by the RE in situ have shown a high degree of correlation, particularly when the presence and localization of highly repeated DNAs are considered (Bianchi et al, 1985;De Stefano et al, 1985;Ferrucci et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%