1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00723-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential actin organization by vinculin isoforms: implications for cell type‐specific microfilament anchorage

Abstract: Vinculin is found in all adherens junctions, while metavinculin, a larger splice variant, is coexpressed with vinculin only in smooth and cardiac muscle. To understand the significance of metavinculin expression, we compared ligand binding between turkey vinculin and metavinculin. Residues 12 58 were found essential for head-tail interactions in both proteins. The tail domains (VT and MVT, respectively) both bind to F-actin. However, while VT bundles F-actin, MVT generates highly viscous F-actin webs. In trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our biochemical studies demonstrate that both vinculin and metavinculin are regulated by an intramolecular head-tail interaction, as had already been suggested from yeast two-hybrid studies (32). However, the binding kinetics of the respective tail domains to the head domain differ to a considerable extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our biochemical studies demonstrate that both vinculin and metavinculin are regulated by an intramolecular head-tail interaction, as had already been suggested from yeast two-hybrid studies (32). However, the binding kinetics of the respective tail domains to the head domain differ to a considerable extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…So far, no metavinculin-specific ligand has been identified, but there is strong evidence that the metavinculin-insert has a modulatory influence on the interaction with ligands of the tail domain. For example, the tail domains of vinculin and metavinculin (MVT) display different F-actin bundling properties (32), and a recently identified novel ligand protein, raver1, shows a higher affinity for metavinculin than for vinculin (33). Because neither binding to actin nor to raver1 directly involves the metavinculin insert, these data argue for a more complex effect of the insert, possibly on the conformation of the vinculin molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas centrifugation at high speed (100 000g) pellets all filamentous actin and associated proteins, centrifugation at 12 000g only sediments actin filaments that are organized into F-actin suprastructures such as filamentous networks or bundles comprising cross-linked filaments. 15 Increasing the molar ratio of any MVT construct with respect to actin caused an increase in the amount of actin that was recovered in the pellet after low-speed centrifugation, indicating that all MVT proteins were able to crosslink actin filaments. Again, no significant differences among the 4 proteins were observed in densitometric analysis of Coomassie Blue-stained gels (data not shown).…”
Section: Wild-type and Mutant Metavinculin Crosslink F-actinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies demonstrated that N-terminal His-tagging of vinculin and metavinculin tail domains does not affect their interaction with actin filaments. 15 Batch purification on Nickel-NTA sepharose was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). Subsequently, proteins were purified on a MonoS column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in S-buffer (50 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 6.5, 0.5 mmol/L EGTA, 15 mmol/L KCl) and eluted with S-buffer containing 1 mol/L NaCl.…”
Section: Protein Isolation and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation