2008
DOI: 10.1080/00036840600771106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different ways of looking at old issues: a time-series approach to inequality and growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy of this equilibrium can be modeled by a vector error correction (VEC) model which shows how after a shock the variables come back to the equilibrium. Gobbin and Rayp (2008) pointed out that a cointegrated VAR-setting approach is the proper way to cope and avoid the problems of parameter heterogeneneity, omitted variable bias and endogeneity of the variables.…”
Section: Dataset and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancy of this equilibrium can be modeled by a vector error correction (VEC) model which shows how after a shock the variables come back to the equilibrium. Gobbin and Rayp (2008) pointed out that a cointegrated VAR-setting approach is the proper way to cope and avoid the problems of parameter heterogeneneity, omitted variable bias and endogeneity of the variables.…”
Section: Dataset and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the aim of this paper is to offer a proper answer to the issue inequality-growth nexus by using a cointegrated vector autoregressive (VAR)-setting approach, in this way, we can cope and avoid the problems of parameter heterogeneneity, omitted variable bias and endogeneity, from which suffers the model of macroeconometric analysis (Gobbin and Rayp, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table A1 reports each ARDL estimation and the Bounds test for cointegration under the null hypothesis of no cointegration. 15 All models estimated included dummy variables to capture the structural break e¤ects. One dummy variable was assigned for each indicator for each country.…”
Section: A5 Local Stability Analysis For the Dynamic System (35)-(38mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because an omitted variable will either be stationary -in which case the estimated coe¢ cients are invariant to its inclusion -or it will be non-stationary -in which case we will not be able to obtain a stable cointegrating relationship if we leave it out. For a further discussion and references on the econometric properties of the time-series approach seeGobbin and Rayp (2008) 15. In order to con…rm that all series are at most integrated of order one we perform for each country two di¤erent group unit root tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some potential econometric problems in the estimating of the production function such as non-stationarity, causality, and omitted variables, see e.g. discussion in Gramlish (1994) and Holtz-Eakin (1994), as well as Temple (1999) and Gobbin and Rayp (2008). We have addressed these problems by using a pooled cross-sectional and time series data, allowing us to use fixed effects, and estimated the model in an error-correction framework.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%